Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24906694›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2014

A 41-gene signature derived from breast cancer stem cells as a predictor of survival.

Zhi-Qiang Yin, Jian-Jun Liu, Ying-Chun Xu, Jian Yu, Guo-Hui Ding, Feng Yang, Lei Tang, Bao-Hong Liu, Yue Ma, Yu-Wei Xia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. RNA sequencing identifiesCytotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Elevated transcription and glycosylation of B3GNT5 promotes breast cancer aggressiveness.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An ER-associated miRNA signature predicts prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2014
    Article
  18. A four-long non-coding RNA signature in predicting breast cancer survival.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhi-Qiang Yin
Jian-Jun Liu
Ying-Chun Xu
Jian Yu
Guo-Hui Ding
Feng Yang
Lei Tang
Bao-Hong Liu
Yue Ma
Yu-Wei Xia
Xiao-Lin Lin
Hong-Xia WangShanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China. whx365@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of a 41-gene signature derived from breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) to estimate the risk of metastasis and survival in breast cancer patients.

methodsThe centroid expression of the 41-gene signature derived from BCSCs was applied as the threshold to classify patients into two separate groups--patients with high expression (high-EL) of the prognostic signature and patients with low expression (low-EL). The predictive ability of the 41-gene signature was evaluated by Cox regression model and was compared against other popular tests, such as Oncotype and MammaPrint.

resultsOur results showed that the 41-gene prognostic signature was significantly associated with age (P = .0351) and ER status (P = .0095). The analysis indicated that patients in the high-EL group had a worse prognosis than those in the low-EL group in terms of both overall survival (OS: HR, 2.05, P = .009) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS: HR, 2.24, P = .002). Additionally, the 41-gene signature was an independent risk factor and separates patients based on estrogen receptor status. While comparable to Oncotype, the analysis demonstrated that the 41-gene signature had a better prognostic value in predicting DMFS and OS than AOL, NPI, St. Gallen, Veridex, and MammaPrint.

conclusionsThis study confirms the utility of the 41-gene signature and adds to the growing evidence that gene expression signatures of BCSCs have clinical potential to predict patient outcome and aid in treatment choice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Stem CellsPrecision MedicinePrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24906694
PMCPMC4229870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.