Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24906502›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015

Collaborative development of clinical trials education programs for African-American community-based organizations.

Natasha Blakeney, Margo Michaels, Melissa Green, Alan Richmond, Debra Long, William S Robinson, Carmelita Spicer, Sharon Elliott-Bynum, Giselle Corbie-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Cancer Patients Perceive Clinical Trials (CTs) in the Era of CTs: Current Perception and Its Differences Between Common and Rare Cancers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating a community-partnered cancer clinical trials pilot intervention with African American communities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  10. Five principles for effective cancer clinical trial education within the community setting.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natasha BlakeneyEducation Network to Advance Cancer Clinical Trials, 7625 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 300, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Margo Michaels
Melissa Green
Alan Richmond
Debra Long
William S Robinson
Carmelita Spicer
Sharon Elliott-Bynum
Giselle Corbie-Smith

Funding

UNC-CH/SHAW: PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTH DISPARITY RESEARCHP60MD000244 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2002 to 2011
$10.3M
Training ProgramU54CA153602 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.4M
Increasing Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment in North Carolina CommunitiesU01CA114629 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2005 to 2009
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114629NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153602NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000244NIMHD NIH HHS P60-MD000244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a unique "Learning and Feedbackˮ approach to customize cancer clinical trials education programs for Community Bridges, a peer training intervention designed for African-American communities in North Carolina. Generic community education modules were demonstrated with key community leaders who were designated as trainers. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were provided on understanding of content, comfort with material, and cultural relevance. The generic materials were adapted into three revised modules, all featuring key messages about cancer clinical trials, discussion regarding distrust of medical research, common misconceptions about trials, patient protections, and a call to action to prompt increased inquiry about locally available trials. The revised modules were then used as part of a train-the-trainer program with 12 African-American community leaders. ENACCT's use of the Learning and Feedback process is an innovative method for culturally adapting clinical trials education.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorPatient Education as TopicBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansNeoplasmsPatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID24906502
PMCPMC4446971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.