Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24906436›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2014

[Early geriatric rehabilitation: an opportunity for the oldest old].

A Kwetkat, T Lehmann, A Wittrich

Abstract readEnglish AbstractHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Geriatric Basics for the Neurohospitalist.The Neurohospitalist · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A KwetkatKlinik für Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland, anja.kwetkat@med.uni-jena.de.
T Lehmann
A Wittrich
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians in Germany who are not specialized in geriatric medicine often have to make decisions regarding referral of patients for early geriatric rehabilitation. The risk of inadequate patient allocation is due to lack of knowledge or underestimation of the potential benefit of early rehabilitation in reducing a patient's need of care. Particularly the oldest old are affected by those inadequate decisions. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on the nationwide database Gemidas Pro, the data sets of ≥ 90-year-old patients were analysed regarding diagnoses, multimorbidity, gender, length of stay, procedures, outcome parameters as nursing personnel regulation (PPR), Barthel index and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test compared to younger age groups. Data from 85 acute inpatient geriatric institutions during the period from January 2006 to December 2009 were included.

resultsNeither the analysis of the diagnosis nor multimorbidity showed relevant differences compared to younger patients. Despite poorer functional status at admission, the ≥ 90 year olds experienced a 25 % increase in the activities of daily living (ADL) measured by PPR, 30 % increase in mobility classification based on the TUG and 59 % increase in ADL measured with the Barthel index. These changes were significantly different. In addition, the length of stay was 18.96 days on average in the group of ≥ 90-year-old patients, which was but not significantly shorter than the length of stay in the group of 70- to 79-year-old (19.7 days) and 80- to 89-year-old patients (19.65 days).

conclusionThe analyses show that the oldest old suffer from more severe deficits in functional status on admission in acute geriatric wards compared to younger patient groups. However, on discharge the oldest old show a significant and relevant increase in mobility and ADL without increase in length of stay.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMobility LimitationAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChronic DiseaseGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHealth Services for the AgedHistory, AncientHumansIncidenceLength of StayRecovery of FunctionReferral and ConsultationRehabilitation Centers

Identifiers

PMID24906436
OpenAlexW2346722935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.