ReviewBiology direct2014
Profiling the orphan enzymes.
Review in Biology direct, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models enhance annotation of enzymes in metagenomes.Science advances · 2026Article
- The history of enzyme evolution embedded in metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Orphan Enzymes in the Mammalian L-Fucose Degradation Pathway.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Dual-encoder contrastive learning accelerates enzyme discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Mendelian randomization linking metabolites with enzymes reveals pathway regulation and therapeutic avenues.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Computational approaches to enzymatic reaction assignment: a review of methods, validations, and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- DeepES: deep learning-based enzyme screening to identify orphan enzyme genes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Activity-based annotation: the emergence of systems biochemistry.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2022Review
- Prokaryotic Genome Annotation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Implementation of Synthetic Pathways to Foster Microbe-Based Production of Non-Naturally Occurring Carboxylic Acids and Derivatives.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A computational workflow for the expansion of heterologous biosynthetic pathways to natural product derivatives.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Addressing uncertainty in genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction and analysis.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Optimization of protease production and sequence analysis of the purified enzyme from the cold adapted yeastBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Implementation of homology based and non-homology based computational methods for the identification and annotation of orphan enzymes: using Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv as a case study.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Systems Biochemistry Approaches to Defining Mitochondrial Protein Function.Cell metabolism · 2020Review
- Towards creating an extended metabolic model (EMM) for E. coli using enzyme promiscuity prediction and metabolomics data.Microbial cell factories · 2019Article
- Enzyme annotation for orphan and novel reactions using knowledge of substrate reactive sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Respiratory chain Complex I of unparalleled divergence in diplonemids.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Discovery of enzymes for toluene synthesis from anoxic microbial communities.Nature chemical biology · 2018Article
- The Complete Genome and Physiological Analysis of the Eurythermal FirmicuteFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of Next Generation Sequencing generates an incredible amount of sequence and great potential for new enzyme discovery. Despite this huge amount of data and the profusion of bioinformatic methods for function prediction, a large part of known enzyme activities is still lacking an associated protein sequence. These particular activities are called "orphan enzymes". The present review proposes an update of previous surveys on orphan enzymes by mining the current content of public databases. While the percentage of orphan enzyme activities has decreased from 38% to 22% in ten years, there are still more than 1,000 orphans among the 5,000 entries of the Enzyme Commission (EC) classification. Taking into account all the reactions present in metabolic databases, this proportion dramatically increases to reach nearly 50% of orphans and many of them are not associated to a known pathway. We extended our survey to "local orphan enzymes" that are activities which have no representative sequence in a given clade, but have at least one in organisms belonging to other clades. We observe an important bias in Archaea and find that in general more than 30% of the EC activities have incomplete sequence information in at least one superkingdom. To estimate if candidate proteins for local orphans could be retrieved by homology search, we applied a simple strategy based on the PRIAM software and noticed that candidates may be proposed for an important fraction of local orphan enzymes. Finally, by studying relation between protein domains and catalyzed activities, it appears that newly discovered enzymes are mostly associated with already known enzyme domains. Thus, the exploration of the promiscuity and the multifunctional aspect of known enzyme families may solve part of the orphan enzyme issue. We conclude this review with a presentation of recent initiatives in finding proteins for orphan enzymes and in extending the enzyme world by the discovery of new activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.