ReviewSleep medicine reviews2015
Spousal involvement and CPAP adherence: a dyadic perspective.
Review in Sleep medicine reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts of conservative treatment on the clinical manifestations of obstructive sleep apnea-systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea; a randomized controlled trial.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Trial
- Effects of solriamfetol in a long-term trial of participants with obstructive sleep apnea who are adherent or nonadherent to airway therapy.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021Trial
- Values expressed by women veterans initiating treatment for sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- Positive Airway Pressure Therapy and Health Care Resource Use in Patients With OSA and Comorbid Insomnia.Chest · 2026Article
- Couple-level obstructive sleep apnea risk and muscle health in middle- and older-aged adults.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
- Three in a Bed: Can Partner Support Improve CPAP Adherence? A Systematic Review and Intervention Recommendations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The Dyadic Relationship of Illness Uncertainty, Social Support, and Coping Styles in Patients with OSA and Their Co-Residents: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model Analysis.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Positive airway pressure adherence among patients with obstructive sleep apnea and cognitive impairment: A narrative review.Sleep medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Marital Relationships: Sleeping Together Again?Cureus · 2023Article
- Dose-Response Relationship between Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy Adherence and Healthcare Utilization.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Adherence to CPAP Treatment: Can Mindfulness Play a Role?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Couples-based interventions to promote PAP adherence among older adults: a qualitative study of patients, partners, and providers.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- Rationale and study protocol for We-PAP: a randomized pilot/feasibility trial of a couples-based intervention to promote PAP adherence and sleep health compared to an educational control.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Intimate Relationships and Coronary Heart Disease: Implications for Risk, Prevention, and Patient Management.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Facilitators and barriers to getting obstructive sleep apnea diagnosed: perspectives from patients and their partners.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- Telehealth Technology Application in Enhancing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Review of Current Evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Utility of Multi-Theory Model (MTM) to Explain the Intention for PAP Adherence in Newly Diagnosed Sleep Apnea Patients.Nature and science of sleep · 2021Article
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Criteria May Limit Treatment to Many Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Poor adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment is associated with substantial health care costs, morbidity and mortality, and has been a leading obstacle in the effective management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Successful interventions to improve CPAP adherence may ultimately include a variety of components. For patients living with spouses (refers to all domestic partners), the spouse will likely be an integral component to any successful intervention. Developing understanding of the role of spouses in adherence to CPAP has been identified to be a critical research need. This review expands the investigation of CPAP adherence to a broader context, from an exclusive focus on individual patients to a dyadic perspective encompassing both patients and their spouses. A conceptual framework based on social support and social control theories is proposed to understand spousal involvement in CPAP adherence. Methodologies for future investigations are discussed, along with implications for developing interventions that engage both patients and their spouses to improve CPAP use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.