Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24906175›Full record

ArticleBio Systems2014

Fast Bayesian parameter estimation for stochastic logistic growth models.

Jonathan Heydari, Conor Lawless, David A Lydall, Darren J Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio Systems, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan HeydariNewcastle University, UK.
Conor LawlessNewcastle University, UK. Electronic address: conor.lawless@ncl.ac.uk.
David A LydallNewcastle University, UK.
Darren J WilkinsonNewcastle University, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UK 13314Medical Research Council MR/L001284/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 075294Wellcome Trust 093088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition density of a stochastic, logistic population growth model with multiplicative intrinsic noise is analytically intractable. Inferring model parameter values by fitting such stochastic differential equation (SDE) models to data therefore requires relatively slow numerical simulation. Where such simulation is prohibitively slow, an alternative is to use model approximations which do have an analytically tractable transition density, enabling fast inference. We introduce two such approximations, with either multiplicative or additive intrinsic noise, each derived from the linear noise approximation (LNA) of a logistic growth SDE. After Bayesian inference we find that our fast LNA models, using Kalman filter recursion for computation of marginal likelihoods, give similar posterior distributions to slow, arbitrarily exact models. We also demonstrate that simulations from our LNA models better describe the characteristics of the stochastic logistic growth models than a related approach. Finally, we demonstrate that our LNA model with additive intrinsic noise and measurement error best describes an example set of longitudinal observations of microbial population size taken from a typical, genome-wide screening experiment.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsPopulation GrowthBayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationSignal-To-Noise RatioStochastic ProcessesKalman filterLinear noise approximationLogisticPopulation growthStochastic modelling

Identifiers

PMID24906175
PMCPMC4169184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.