ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2014
3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed.
- Super homotypic targeting by surface engineering of extracellular vesicles.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Emerging non-antibiotic strategies for implant-associated biofilm infections by reprogramming the dysregulated immune microenvironment.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- Fabrication and characterisation of Ti and DLC coatings on metamaterial-architecture-inspired 3D-printed polymer substrates.The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology · 2026Article
- Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026Review
- Development and in vitro evaluation of biomimetic injectable hydrogels from decellularized human nerves for central nervous system regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Application of decellularization methods for scaffold production: advantages, disadvantages, biosafety and modifications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Applications of bone regenerative medicine in the foot and ankle: mechanisms, technologies, and therapeutic advances.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Sound innovations for biofabrication and tissue engineering.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Review
- Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence in 3D bioprinting.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Research Progress on Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Zinc Alloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Detecting Nanotopography Induced Changes in Cell Migration Directions Using Oxygen Sensors.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Review on Engineering of Bone Scaffolds Using Conventional and Additive Manufacturing Technologies.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Review
- Light-based 3D bioprinting technology applied to repair and regeneration of different tissues: A rational proposal for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell-Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Nanoformulations in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications: Green Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Acoustic Cell Patterning for Structured Cell-Laden Hydrogel Fibers/Tubules.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Advances and challenges in regenerative therapies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Injectable Biomimetic Hydrogel Constructs for Cell-Based Menopausal Hormone Therapy with Reduced Breast Cancer Potential.Biomaterials research · 2024Article
- Modern advances in spinal cord regeneration: hydrogel combined with neural stem cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past several decades, there has been an ever-increasing demand for organ transplants. However, there is a severe shortage of donor organs, and as a result of the increasing demand, the gap between supply and demand continues to widen. A potential solution to this problem is to grow or fabricate organs using biomaterial scaffolds and a person's own cells. Although the realization of this solution has been limited, the development of new biofabrication approaches has made it more realistic. This review provides an overview of natural and synthetic biomaterials that have been used for organ/tissue development. It then discusses past and current biofabrication techniques, with a brief explanation of the state of the art. Finally, the review highlights the need for combining vascularization strategies with current biofabrication techniques. Given the multitude of applications of biofabrication technologies, from organ/tissue development to drug discovery/screening to development of complex in vitro models of human diseases, these manufacturing technologies can have a significant impact on the future of medicine and health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.