Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24905456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.

Li-Xuan Qin, Qin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Post-Processing Algorithm for miRNA Microarray Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cautionary Note on Using Cross-Validation for Molecular Classification.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li-Xuan QinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Qin ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Statistical Methods for Normalizing Microarrays in Cancer Biomarker StudiesR01CA151947 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI QIN, LI-XUAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA008748NCI NIH HHS CA151947NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA arrays possess a number of unique data features that challenge the assumption key to many normalization methods. We assessed the performance of existing normalization methods using two microRNA array datasets derived from the same set of tumor samples: one dataset was generated using a blocked randomization design when assigning arrays to samples and hence was free of confounding array effects; the second dataset was generated without blocking or randomization and exhibited array effects. The randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression between two tumor groups and treated as the benchmark. The non-randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression after normalization and compared against the benchmark. Normalization improved the true positive rate significantly in the non-randomized data but still possessed a false discovery rate as high as 50%. Adding a batch adjustment step before normalization further reduced the number of false positive markers while maintaining a similar number of true positive markers, which resulted in a false discovery rate of 32% to 48%, depending on the specific normalization method. We concluded the paper with some insights on possible causes of false discoveries to shed light on how to improve normalization for microRNA arrays.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceBenchmarkingDatasets as TopicFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisStatistics as TopicMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24905456
PMCPMC4048305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.