Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24905171›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2014

Does the age-related "anterior shift" of the P3 reflect an inability to habituate the novelty response?

Brittany R Alperin, Katherine K Mott, Phillip J Holcomb, Kirk R Daffner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany R AlperinCenter for Brain/Mind Medicine, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Katherine K MottCenter for Brain/Mind Medicine, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Phillip J HolcombDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Kirk R DaffnerCenter for Brain/Mind Medicine, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: kdaffner@partners.org.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

ERP Investigations of Novelty Processing in Different Patterns of Cognitive AgingR01AG017935 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAFFNER, KIRK R · 2002 to 2012
$4.5M
The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017935NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD025889PHS HHS R01 AGO17935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Old adults often generate larger anterior neural responses than young adults when carrying out task requirements. A common finding in the ERP literature is an "anterior shift" of the P3b to targets. Utilizing principal component analysis (PCA), we recently demonstrated that rather than the P3b moving anteriorly, old adults generate a large P3a that temporally overlaps with their P3b. A dominant hypothesis for the age-related increase in anterior P3 is the failure to habituate the brain's novelty response to rare targets. We tested this hypothesis in young and old adults by comparing the amplitude of the PCA factor representing P3a to targets presented in the first versus last of eight blocks of a visual oddball task. If, unlike young adults, old adults are unable to habituate a novelty response, one would expect (1) the P3a amplitude to decrease between the first and last blocks for young, but not old subjects and (2) the difference in P3a amplitude between young and old subjects to be greater in the last than the first block. Our results indicate the amplitude of the P3a was larger in old adults than young adults. However, this effect was not modulated by block. These findings argue against the hypothesis that an age-related increase in the P3a to targets reflects an inability of old subjects to habituate a novelty response. An alternative hypothesis is that the augmented P3a indexes the increased utilization of frontal executive functions to provide compensatory scaffolding to carry out a task.

Indexed as

Event-Related Potentials, P300AdultAgedAge FactorsBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHabituation, PsychophysiologicHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAgingERPsHabituationOrientingP3PCA

Identifiers

PMID24905171
PMCPMC4128337
OpenAlexW2067983276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.