Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24905018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

GWAS in a box: statistical and visual analytics of structured associations via GenAMap.

Eric P Xing, Ross E Curtis, Georg Schoenherr, Seunghak Lee, Junming Yin, Kriti Puniyani, Wei Wu, Peter Kinnaird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric P XingMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ross E CurtisJoint Carnegie Mellon - University of Pittsburgh PhD Program in Computational Biology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Lane Center for Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Georg SchoenherrComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Seunghak LeeComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Junming YinLane Center for Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kriti PuniyaniLanguage Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Wei WuLane Center for Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Peter KinnairdHuman Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Genome-Transcription-Phenome-Wide Association: a new paradigm for association stuR01GM087694 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI WU, WEI, XING, ERIC P · 2009 to 2014
$2.5M
Time/Space-Varying Networks of Molecular Interactions: A New Paradigm for StudyinR01GM093156 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI XING, ERIC P · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM087694NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM093156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087694NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093156PHS HHS 0015699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous improvement in genotyping and molecular phenotyping technology and the decreasing typing cost, it is expected that in a few years, more and more clinical studies of complex diseases will recruit thousands of individuals for pan-omic genetic association analyses. Hence, there is a great need for algorithms and software tools that could scale up to the whole omic level, integrate different omic data, leverage rich structure information, and be easily accessible to non-technical users. We present GenAMap, an interactive analytics software platform that 1) automates the execution of principled machine learning methods that detect genome- and phenome-wide associations among genotypes, gene expression data, and clinical or other macroscopic traits, and 2) provides new visualization tools specifically designed to aid in the exploration of association mapping results. Algorithmically, GenAMap is based on a new paradigm for GWAS and PheWAS analysis, termed structured association mapping, which leverages various structures in the omic data. We demonstrate the function of GenAMap via a case study of the Brem and Kruglyak yeast dataset, and then apply it on a comprehensive eQTL analysis of the NIH heterogeneous stock mice dataset and report some interesting findings. GenAMap is available from http://sailing.cs.cmu.edu/genamap.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceGenome-Wide Association StudyMiceQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID24905018
PMCPMC4048179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.