ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2014
Implicit motivational processes underlying smoking in american and dutch adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-site proof-of-concept investigation of computerized approach-avoidance training in adolescent cannabis users.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2018Trial
- Impulsivity and approach tendencies towards cigarette stimuli: Implications for cigarette smoking and cessation behaviors among youth.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2017Trial
- Re-training automatic action tendencies to approach cigarettes among adolescent smokers: a pilot study.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2015Trial
- Can implicit associations and approach-avoidance tendencies be observed in both problematic social network use and tobacco use disorder? Evidence from a laboratory study.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- Improving the touchscreen-based food approach-avoidance task: remediated block-order effects and initial findings regarding validity.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- Approach bias retraining to augment smoking cessation: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- A fractionated analysis of hot and cool self-regulation in cigarette smokers from different socioeconomic backgrounds.PloS one · 2019Article
- Affect, craving, and cognition: An EMA study of ad libitum adolescent smoking.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018Article
- Clinical Depression and Punishment Sensitivity on the BART.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Cue Reactivity in Nicotine and Alcohol Addiction: A Cross-Cultural View.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Assessment of Tobacco-Related Approach and Attentional Biases in Smokers, Cravers, Ex-Smokers, and Non-Smokers.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- On the Development of Implicit and Control Processes in Relation to Substance Use in Adolescence.Current addiction reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionResearch demonstrates that cognitive biases toward drug-related stimuli are correlated with substance use. This study aimed to investigate differences in cognitive biases (i.e., approach bias, attentional bias, and memory associations) between smoking and non-smoking adolescents in the US and the Netherlands. Within the group of smokers, we examined the relative predictive value of the cognitive biases and impulsivity related constructs (including inhibition skills, working memory, and risk taking) on daily smoking and nicotine dependence.
methodA total of 125 American and Dutch adolescent smokers (n = 67) and non-smokers (n = 58) between 13 and 18 years old participated. Participants completed the smoking approach-avoidance task, the classical and emotional Stroop task, brief implicit associations task, balloon analog risk task, the self-ordering pointing task, and a questionnaire assessing level of nicotine dependence and smoking behavior.
resultsThe analytical sample consisted of 56 Dutch adolescents (27 smokers and 29 non-smokers) and 37 American adolescents (19 smokers and 18 non-smokers). No differences in cognitive biases between smokers and non-smokers were found. Generally, Dutch adolescents demonstrated an avoidance bias toward both smoking and neutral stimuli whereas the American adolescents did not demonstrate a bias. Within the group of smokers, regression analyses showed that stronger attentional bias and weaker inhibition skills predicted greater nicotine dependence while weak working memory predicted more daily cigarette use.
conclusionAttentional bias, inhibition skills, and working memory might be important factors explaining smoking in adolescence. Cultural differences in approach-avoidance bias should be considered in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.