ReviewFrontiers in neuroengineering2014
Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces.
Review in Frontiers in neuroengineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanofluidic-based electrochemical pump for remotely controlled, on-demand drug delivery.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Multi-Channel Neural Interface for Neural Recording and Neuromodulation.Small methods · 2026Review
- Review
- Bio-inspired electronics: Soft, biohybrid, and "living" neural interfaces.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Constructing organoid-brain-computer interfaces for neurofunctional repair after brain injury.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Interface-Mediated Neurogenic Signaling: The Impact of Surface Geometry and Chemistry on Neural Cell Behavior for Regenerative and Brain-Machine Interfacing Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Bioelectronic Neural Interfaces: Improving Neuromodulation Through Organic Conductive Coatings.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Biomedical applications of stimuli-responsive "smart" interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Thin-film implants for bioelectronic medicine.MRS bulletin · 2024Review
- Article
- Streamlining the interface between electronics and neural systems for bidirectional electrochemical communication.Chemical science · 2023Review
- Functional neurological restoration of amputated peripheral nerve using biohybrid regenerative bioelectronics.Science advances · 2023Article
- In Vivo Penetrating Microelectrodes for Brain Electrophysiology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Femtosecond laser hierarchical surface restructuring for next generation neural interfacing electrodes and microelectrode arrays.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Vitamin C-reduced graphene oxide improves the performance and stability of multimodal neural microelectrodes.iScience · 2022Article
- Polysaccharide Layer-by-Layer Coating for Polyimide-Based Neural Interfaces.Micromachines · 2022Article
- An electroactive hybrid biointerface for enhancing neuronal differentiation and axonal outgrowth on bio-subretinal chip.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Review
- Semiconducting Polymers for Neural Applications.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- A Hydrogel-Based Microfluidic Nerve Cuff for Neuromodulation of Peripheral Nerves.Micromachines · 2021Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional neuronal interfaces utilize metallic electrodes which in recent years have reached a plateau in terms of the ability to provide safe stimulation at high resolution or rather with high densities of microelectrodes with improved spatial selectivity. To achieve higher resolution it has become clear that reducing the size of electrodes is required to enable higher electrode counts from the implant device. The limitations of interfacing electrodes including low charge injection limits, mechanical mismatch and foreign body response can be addressed through the use of organic electrode coatings which typically provide a softer, more roughened surface to enable both improved charge transfer and lower mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. Coating electrodes with conductive polymers or carbon nanotubes offers a substantial increase in charge transfer area compared to conventional platinum electrodes. These organic conductors provide safe electrical stimulation of tissue while avoiding undesirable chemical reactions and cell damage. However, the mechanical properties of conductive polymers are not ideal, as they are quite brittle. Hydrogel polymers present a versatile coating option for electrodes as they can be chemically modified to provide a soft and conductive scaffold. However, the in vivo chronic inflammatory response of these conductive hydrogels remains unknown. A more recent approach proposes tissue engineering the electrode interface through the use of encapsulated neurons within hydrogel coatings. This approach may provide a method for activating tissue at the cellular scale, however, several technological challenges must be addressed to demonstrate feasibility of this innovative idea. The review focuses on the various organic coatings which have been investigated to improve neural interface electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.