Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904399›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014

Web based tools for visualizing imaging data and development of XNATView, a zero footprint image viewer.

David A Gutman, William D Dunn, Jake Cobb, Richard M Stoner, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Bradley Erickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A GutmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.
William D DunnDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jake CobbGeorgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing Atlanta, GA, USA.
Richard M StonerDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Charlestown, MA, USA.
Bradley EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Quantitative MRI of Glioblastoma ResponseU01CA154601 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE · 2011 to 2016
$3.4M
Clinical Image Retrieval: User needs assessment toolbox development & evaluationR00LM009889 · NLM · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE · 2011 to 2013
$690k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154601NLM NIH HHS R00 LM009889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in web technologies now allow direct visualization of imaging data sets without necessitating the download of large file sets or the installation of software. This allows centralization of file storage and facilitates image review and analysis. XNATView is a light framework recently developed in our lab to visualize DICOM images stored in The Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit (XNAT). It consists of a PyXNAT-based framework to wrap around the REST application programming interface (API) and query the data in XNAT. XNATView was developed to simplify quality assurance, help organize imaging data, and facilitate data sharing for intra- and inter-laboratory collaborations. Its zero-footprint design allows the user to connect to XNAT from a web browser, navigate through projects, experiments, and subjects, and view DICOM images with accompanying metadata all within a single viewing instance.

Indexed as

biomedical imagingDICOM-viewerMRIPyXNATradiologyweb-based image viewerXNAT

Identifiers

PMID24904399
PMCPMC4034701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.