ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014
Corticofugal projections induce long-lasting effects on somatosensory responses in the trigeminal complex of the rat.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Somatosensory control of thalamic relay neurons is regulated by two distinct layer 6 feedback systems.iScience · 2026Article
- Somatosensory cortical progesterone receptor signaling regulates the episodic to chronic migraine transformation.Neurobiology of disease · 2026Article
- Organization and development of bilateral somatosensory feedback projections in mice.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Time course of the rubber hand illusion-induced analgesia.Pain reports · 2025Article
- Neurocircuitry basis of motor cortex-related analgesia as an emerging approach for chronic pain management.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Central generators of migraine and autonomic cephalalgias as targets for personalized pain management: Translational links.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2023Review
- Interactions of Whisking and Touch Signals in the Rat Brainstem.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Cortical Regulation of Nociception of the Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Attention to pain! A neurocognitive perspective on attentional modulation of pain in neuroimaging studies.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2017Review
- Neonatal sensory nerve injury-induced synaptic plasticity in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus.Experimental neurology · 2016Review
- Sensory Activity-Dependent and Sensory Activity-Independent Properties of the Developing Rodent Trigeminal Principal Nucleus.Developmental neuroscience · 2016Review
- The effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation on Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibre brain responses in humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2015Article
- Corticofugal projection patterns of whisker sensorimotor cortex to the sensory trigeminal nuclei.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sensory information flow at subcortical relay stations is controlled by the action of topographic connections from the neocortex. To determinate the functional properties of the somatosensory corticofugal projections to the principal (Pr5) and caudal spinal (Sp5C) trigeminal nuclei, we performed unitary recordings in anesthetized rats. To examine the effect of these cortical projections we used tactile stimulation of the whisker and electrical stimulation of somatosensory cortices. Corticofugal anatomical projections to Pr5 and Sp5C nuclei were detected by using retrograde fluorescent tracers. Neurons projecting exclusively to Pr5 were located in the cingulate cortex while neurons projecting to both Sp5C and Pr5 nuclei were located in the somatosensory and insular cortices (>75% of neurons). Physiological results indicated that primary somatosensory cortex produced a short-lasting facilitating or inhibiting effects (<5 min) of tactile responses in Pr5 nucleus through activation of NMDA glutamatergic or GABAA receptors since effects were blocked by iontophoretically application of APV and bicuculline, respectively. In contrast, stimulation of secondary somatosensory cortex did not affect most of the Pr5 neurons; however both cortices inhibited the nociceptive responses in the Sp5C nucleus through activation of glycinergic or GABAA receptors because effects were blocked by iontophoretically application of strychnine and bicuculline, respectively. These and anatomical results demonstrated that the somatosensory cortices projects to Pr5 nucleus to modulate tactile responses by excitatory and inhibitory actions, while projections to the Sp5C nucleus control nociceptive sensory transmission by only inhibitory effects. Thus, somatosensory cortices may modulate innocuous and noxious inputs simultaneously, contributing to the perception of specifically tactile or painful sensations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.