Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904306›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2014

Active learning of neuron morphology for accurate automated tracing of neurites.

Rohan Gala, Julio Chapeton, Jayant Jitesh, Chintan Bhavsar, Armen Stepanyants

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NeuRegenerate: A Framework for Visualizing Neurodegeneration.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Correction of topological errors in automated traces of neurites.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Content-Aware Enhancement of Images With Filamentous Structures.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Accurate registration ofProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  14. Artificial neural network filters for enhancing 3D optical microscopy images of neurites.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohan GalaDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.
Julio ChapetonDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.
Jayant JiteshDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.
Chintan BhavsarDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.
Armen StepanyantsDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Automated reconstruction of neurites from 3D microscopy image stacksR01NS063494 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPANYANTS, ARMEN · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automating the process of neurite tracing from light microscopy stacks of images is essential for large-scale or high-throughput quantitative studies of neural circuits. While the general layout of labeled neurites can be captured by many automated tracing algorithms, it is often not possible to differentiate reliably between the processes belonging to different cells. The reason is that some neurites in the stack may appear broken due to imperfect labeling, while others may appear fused due to the limited resolution of optical microscopy. Trained neuroanatomists routinely resolve such topological ambiguities during manual tracing tasks by combining information about distances between branches, branch orientations, intensities, calibers, tortuosities, colors, as well as the presence of spines or boutons. Likewise, to evaluate different topological scenarios automatically, we developed a machine learning approach that combines many of the above mentioned features. A specifically designed confidence measure was used to actively train the algorithm during user-assisted tracing procedure. Active learning significantly reduces the training time and makes it possible to obtain less than 1% generalization error rates by providing few training examples. To evaluate the overall performance of the algorithm a number of image stacks were reconstructed automatically, as well as manually by several trained users, making it possible to compare the automated traces to the baseline inter-user variability. Several geometrical and topological features of the traces were selected for the comparisons. These features include the total trace length, the total numbers of branch and terminal points, the affinity of corresponding traces, and the distances between corresponding branch and terminal points. Our results show that when the density of labeled neurites is sufficiently low, automated traces are not significantly different from manual reconstructions obtained by trained users.

Indexed as

active learningautomated reconstructionautomated tracingaxondendritesmachine learningNCTracerneural circuit tracer

Identifiers

PMID24904306
PMCPMC4032887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.