ReviewInternational journal of women's health2014
A review of frovatriptan for the treatment of menstrual migraine.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2019Guideline
- Pharmacokinetic Study of Frovatriptan Succinate Tablet After Single and Multiple Oral Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Trial
- Migraine and Its Treatment from the Medicinal Chemistry Perspective.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- The prodrome of migraine: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Sex and Gender Considerations in Episodic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Preventing the Progression of Episodic Migraine to Chronic Migraine with Acute Treatment Optimization.Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Migraine Treatment: Current Acute Medications and Their Potential Mechanisms of Action.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018Review
- Estrogen-Dependent Changes in Dura Mater Microvasculature Add New Insights to the Pathogenesis of Headache.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Review
- Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) as mini-prophylaxis for menstrual/menstrually related migraine: an open-label study.The journal of headache and pain · 2016Article
- Recent advances in migraine therapy.SpringerPlus · 2016Review
- Triptans disrupt brain networks and promote stress-induced CSD-like responses in cortical and subcortical areas.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this review is to provide an overview of menstrual migraine (MM) and of frovatriptan and to assess clinical trial data regarding the efficacy and safety of frovatriptan for the acute and short-term prophylaxis of MM. Randomized controlled trials comparing frovatriptan with placebo or a triptan comparator for the acute or prophylactic treatment of MM were selected for review. MM affects up to 60% of women with migraine. Compared with attacks at other times of the cycle, menstrual attacks are longer, more severe, less responsive to treatment, more likely to relapse, and more disabling than attacks at other times of the cycle. No drugs are licensed for acute treatment of MM; triptans are recommended for treatment of moderate to severe attacks for menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks. Perimenstrual prophylaxis is indicated for patients with predictable MM that does not respond to symptomatic treatment alone. Treatment is unlicensed, but options include triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and hormone manipulation. Frovatriptan is distinctive from other triptans due to its long elimination half-life of 26 hours, which confers a longer duration of action. Post hoc analyses from randomized trials of MM show similar pain relief and pain-free rates for frovatriptan compared with other triptans (2 hours pain-free: relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.76) but significantly lower relapse rates (24 hours sustained pain-free: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.62). Data from randomized controlled trials show a significant reduction in risk of MM in women using frovatriptan 2.5 mg once daily (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31-1.86) or twice daily (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68-2.34) for perimenstrual prophylaxis compared with placebo. The twice daily dosing was more effective than once daily (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46). These findings support the use of frovatriptan as a first-line acute treatment for MM and for perimenstrual prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.