Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904217›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2014

Opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK: descriptive analysis of baseline patient-reported outcomes and retrospective chart review.

Karin S Coyne, Robert J LoCasale, Catherine J Datto, Chris C Sexton, Karen Yeomans, Jan Tack

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03060512 (A Phase IV, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Prospective, Crossover Study to Evaluate Patient Preference of Movantik™ Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Opioid-Induced Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03060512 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Phase IV, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Prospective, Crossover Study to Evaluate Patient Preference of Movantik™ Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC) Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled276ConditionsOpioid Induced ConstipationArmsPolyethylene Glycol 3350, Movantik
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. PAMORAs in Opioid-Induced Constipation: Are We Following the Guidelines?Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin S CoyneEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert J LoCasaleAstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Catherine J DattoAstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Chris C SextonEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Karen YeomansUBC: an Express Scripts Company, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jan TackUniversity Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USIthaka Harbors · USUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe characteristics of patients who suffer from noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation are not well understood.

methodsCross-sectional patient survey and chart review data from the baseline assessment of an ongoing longitudinal study in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK were evaluated via descriptive statistics. Participants had confirmation of daily opioid therapy ≥30 mg for ≥4 weeks and self-reported opioid-induced constipation. Response to laxatives was defined by classifying participants into categories of laxative use and evaluating the prevalence of inadequate response to one laxative agent and two or more agents from at least two different laxative classes. Outcomes included the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem, EuroQOL 5 Dimensions, and Global Assessment of Treatment Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue.

resultsPatients reported a mean of 1.4 bowel movements not preceded by laxatives and 3.7 bowel movements with laxative use per week; 83% wanted at least one bowel movement per day. Most commonly reported on Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms were straining/squeezing to pass bowel movements (83%), bowel movements too hard (75%), flatulence (69%), and bloating (69%). Eighty-four percent were taking natural or behavioral therapies; 60% were taking at least one over-the-counter laxative; and 19% were taking at least one prescription laxative. Prevalence of inadequate response to one laxative agent was 94%; inadequate response to two or more agents from at least two different laxative classes was 27%. Mean Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem values for percent work time missed, percent impairment while working, and percent activity impairment were 9%, 32% (equivalent of 14 hours of lost productivity per week), and 38%. Mean EuroQOL 5 Dimensions index and visual analog scale scores were 0.49 and 50.6, respectively. Forty-four percent reported being satisfied with their treatment for constipation.

conclusionPatients treated with opioids for noncancer pain commonly endure constipation symptoms that limit their work productivity and overall health-related quality of life while adhering to treatments that provide little relief. Further research is needed to identify more efficacious constipation therapies for this patient population.

Indexed as

constipationlaxativesopioidpainquality of life

Identifiers

PMID24904217
PMCPMC4041290
OpenAlexW2147808981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.