Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904213›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Nanomedicine for drug targeting: strategies beyond the enhanced permeability and retention effect.

Hayley Nehoff, Neha N Parayath, Laura Domanovitch, Sebastien Taurin, Khaled Greish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley NehoffDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Neha N ParayathDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Laura DomanovitchDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sebastien TaurinDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Khaled GreishDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand ; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing research interest in nanomedicine for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory-related pathologies is yielding encouraging results. Unfortunately, enthusiasm is tempered by the limited specificity of the enhanced permeability and retention effect. Factors such as lack of cellular specificity, low vascular density, and early release of active agents prior to reaching their target contribute to the limitations of the enhanced permeability and retention effect. However, improved nanomedicine designs are creating opportunities to overcome these problems. In this review, we present examples of the advances made in this field and endeavor to highlight the potential of these emerging technologies to improve targeting of nanomedicine to specific pathological cells and tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological AvailabilityDrug CompoundingDrug DesignHumansInflammationNanocapsulesNeoplasmsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsNanocapsulescancer treatmentinflammationnanomedicinepermeability and retention effecttissue targeting

Identifiers

PMID24904213
PMCPMC4039421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.