Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904069›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015

Electrocorticography Reveals Enhanced Visual Cortex Responses to Visual Speech.

Inga M Schepers, Daniel Yoshor, Michael S Beauchamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Benefit of visual speech information for word comprehension in post-stroke aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Crossmodal Phase Reset and Evoked Responses Provide Complementary Mechanisms for the Influence of Visual Speech in Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inga M SchepersDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA Current Address: Department of Psychology, Oldenburg University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Daniel YoshorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael S BeauchampDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF OPTIMAL MULTISENSORY INTEGRATIONR01NS065395 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Michael S Beauchamp · 2010 to 2026
$5.5M
Multisensory Processing of Human Speech Measured with msec and mm ResolutionI01CX001122 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2015 to 2022
–
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS065395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human speech contains both auditory and visual components, processed by their respective sensory cortices. We test a simple model in which task-relevant speech information is enhanced during cortical processing. Visual speech is most important when the auditory component is uninformative. Therefore, the model predicts that visual cortex responses should be enhanced to visual-only (V) speech compared with audiovisual (AV) speech. We recorded neuronal activity as patients perceived auditory-only (A), V, and AV speech. Visual cortex showed strong increases in high-gamma band power and strong decreases in alpha-band power to V and AV speech. Consistent with the model prediction, gamma-band increases and alpha-band decreases were stronger for V speech. The model predicts that the uninformative nature of the auditory component (not simply its absence) is the critical factor, a prediction we tested in a second experiment in which visual speech was paired with auditory white noise. As predicted, visual speech with auditory noise showed enhanced visual cortex responses relative to AV speech. An examination of the anatomical locus of the effects showed that all visual areas, including primary visual cortex, showed enhanced responses. Visual cortex responses to speech are enhanced under circumstances when visual information is most important for comprehension.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAcoustic StimulationAdultAlpha RhythmAnalysis of VarianceElectroencephalographyFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychoacousticsSpeech PerceptionTime FactorsVisual CortexYoung Adultaudiovisualelectrocorticographyhigh gammaspeechvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID24904069
PMCPMC4715246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.