Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24904016›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2014

Interventricular differences in β-adrenergic responses in the canine heart: role of phosphodiesterases.

Cristina E Molina, Daniel M Johnson, Hind Mehel, Roel L H M G Spätjens, Delphine Mika, Vincent Algalarrondo, Zeineb Haj Slimane, Patrick Lechêne, Najah Abi-Gerges, Henk J van der Linde and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of zacopride, a moderate IPharmacological research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cristina E MolinaINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Daniel M JohnsonDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands (D.M.J., R.G.S., P.A.V.).
Hind MehelINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Roel L H M G SpätjensDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands (D.M.J., R.G.S., P.A.V.).
Delphine MikaINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Vincent AlgalarrondoINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Zeineb Haj SlimaneINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Patrick LechêneINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Najah Abi-GergesDepartment of Translational Safety, DrugSafety and Metabolism, AstraZeneca R&D Innovative Medicines and Early Development, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, Cheshire, UK (N.A.G.).
Henk J van der LindeGlobal Safety Research, Preclinical Development & Safety, Discovery Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium (H.J.L.).
Jérôme LeroyINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Paul G A VoldersDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands (D.M.J., R.G.S., P.A.V.).
Rodolphe FischmeisterINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).
Grégoire VandecasteeleINSERM UMR-S 769, LabEx LERMIT, DHU TORINO, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.) Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France (C.E.M., H.M., D.M., V.A., Z.H.S., P.L., L., R.F., G.V.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRV and LV have different embryologic, structural, metabolic, and electrophysiologic characteristics, but whether interventricular differences exist in β-adrenergic (β-AR) responsiveness is unknown. In this study, we examine whether β-AR response and signaling differ in right (RV) versus left (LV) ventricles. METHODS AND

resultsSarcomere shortening, Ca(2+) transients, ICa,L and IKs currents were recorded in isolated dog LV and RV midmyocytes. Intracellular [cAMP] and PKA activity were measured by live cell imaging using FRET-based sensors. Isoproterenol increased sarcomere shortening ≈10-fold and Ca(2+)-transient amplitude ≈2-fold in LV midmyocytes (LVMs) versus ≈25-fold and ≈3-fold in RVMs. FRET imaging using targeted Epac2camps sensors revealed no change in subsarcolemmal [cAMP], but a 2-fold higher β-AR stimulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP] in RVMs versus LVMs. Accordingly, β-AR regulation of ICa,L and IKs were similar between LVMs and RVMs, whereas cytoplasmic PKA activity was increased in RVMs. Both PDE3 and PDE4 contributed to the β-AR regulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP], and the difference between LVMs and RVMs was abolished by PDE3 inhibition and attenuated by PDE4 inhibition. Finally LV and RV intracavitary pressures were recorded in anesthetized beagle dogs. A bolus injection of isoproterenol increased RV dP/dtmax≈5-fold versus 3-fold in LV.

conclusionCanine RV and LV differ in their β-AR response due to intrinsic differences in myocyte β-AR downstream signaling. Enhanced β-AR responsiveness of the RV results from higher cAMP elevation in the cytoplasm, due to a decreased degradation by PDE3 and PDE4 in the RV compared to the LV.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCyclic AMPDogsFemaleHeartHeart VentriclesMyocytes, CardiacPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesReceptors, Adrenergic, betaSarcomeresVentricular FunctionCalciumCyclic AMPPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesReceptors, Adrenergic, betacAMPdogheart ventriclesphosphodiesterasesβ‐adrenergic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24904016
PMCPMC4309082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.