Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24903996›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2014

HER-2 overexpression and survival in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Chao Li, Da-ren Liu, Long-yun Ye, Ling-na Huang, Sanjay Jaiswal, Xiao-wen Li, Hou-hong Wang, Li Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chao LiDepartment of Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Da-ren Liu
Long-yun Ye
Ling-na Huang
Sanjay Jaiswal
Xiao-wen Li
Hou-hong Wang
Li Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNumerous studies examining the relationship between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpression and survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have yielded controversial results. We therefore performed a meta-analysis more precisely to estimate its prognostic value.

methodsPublished studies investigating the effect of HER-2 overexpression on CRC survival were identified; the hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled in terms of disease-specific or overall survival.

resultsEleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data showed that HER-2 overexpression was negatively related to CRC survival (HR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.77-1.44). Subgroup analyses regarding test method and study quality also demonstrated little association between HER-2 overexpression and CRC survival (HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.50-1.29; HR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.43-1.37, respectively).

conclusionsRegardless of several limitations, our study suggested that HER-2 overexpression probably had little impact on CRC survival.

Indexed as

Survival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIncidenceInternationalityMaleNeoplasm ProteinsProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoplasm ProteinsColorectal cancer (CRC)Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)Meta-analysisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID24903996
PMCPMC4116855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.