Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24903274›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2014

Rac1 GTPase silencing counteracts microgravity-induced effects on osteoblastic cells.

Alain Guignandon, Céline Faure, Thibaut Neutelings, Aline Rattner, Pierre Mineur, Marie-Thérèse Linossier, Norbert Laroche, Charles Lambert, Christophe Deroanne, Betty Nusgens and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Omics Studies of Tumor Cells under Microgravity Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of wnt signaling in diabetes-induced osteoporosis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Osteocytes and Weightlessness.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Impact of Spaceflight and Simulated Microgravity on Cell Adhesion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alain GuignandonInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France; alain.guignandon@univ-st-etienne.fr.
Céline FaureInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France;
Thibaut NeutelingsLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
Aline RattnerInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France;
Pierre MineurLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
Marie-Thérèse LinossierInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France;
Norbert LarocheInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France;
Charles LambertLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
Christophe DeroanneLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
Betty NusgensLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
René DemetsEuropean Space Research and Technology Center (ESTEC), Human Spaceflight and Operations (HSO), Biological Science Unit (BSU), Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Alain ColigeLaboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, Groupe Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliqué (GIGA), Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium; and.
Laurence VicoInstitute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 1059, Laboratoire de Biologie Intégrée du Tissu Osseux, Université de Lyon, St-Etienne, France;
University of Liège · BENational Institute of Health · AMUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FREuropean Space Research and Technology Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone cells exposed to real microgravity display alterations of their cytoskeleton and focal adhesions, two major mechanosensitive structures. These structures are controlled by small GTPases of the Ras homology (Rho) family. We investigated the effects of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 modulation of osteoblastic cells under microgravity conditions. Human MG-63 osteoblast-like cells silenced for RhoGTPases were cultured in the automated Biobox bioreactor (European Space Agency) aboard the Foton M3 satellite and compared to replicate ground-based controls. The cells were fixed after 69 h of microgravity exposure for postflight analysis of focal contacts, F-actin polymerization, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, and matrix targeting. We found that RhoA silencing did not affect sensitivity to microgravity but that Rac1 and, to a lesser extent, Cdc42 abrogation was particularly efficient in counteracting the spaceflight-related reduction of the number of focal contacts [-50% in silenced, scrambled (SiScr) controls vs. -15% for SiRac1], the number of F-actin fibers (-60% in SiScr controls vs. -10% for SiRac1), and the depletion of matrix-bound VEGF (-40% in SiScr controls vs. -8% for SiRac1). Collectively, these data point out the role of the VEGF/Rho GTPase axis in mechanosensing and validate Rac1-mediated signaling pathways as potential targets for counteracting microgravity effects.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaWeightlessnessActinscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCells, CulturedCytoskeletonGravity SensingHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMicrotubulesOsteoblastsrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRNA, MessengerActinscdc42 GTP-Binding Proteinrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinRAC1 protein, humanrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRHOA protein, humanRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanCdc42MG-63RhoAspaceflightVEGF

Identifiers

PMID24903274
PMCPMC5395736
OpenAlexW2018109687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.