Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24903023›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2015

Productivity or discrimination? An economic analysis of excess-weight penalty in the Swedish labor market.

Margareta Dackehag, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Martin Nordin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Wage Penalties or Wage Premiums? A Socioeconomic Analysis of Gender Disparity in Obesity in Urban China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Waist circumference, body mass index, and employment outcomes.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margareta DackehagDepartment of Economics, Lund University, P.O. Box 7082, 220 07, Lund, Sweden, Margareta.Dackehag@nek.lu.se.
Ulf-G Gerdtham
Martin Nordin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article investigates the excess-weight penalty in income for men and women in the Swedish labor market, using longitudinal data. It compares two identification strategies, OLS and individual fixed effects, and distinguishes between two main sources of excess-weight penalties, lower productivity because of bad health and discrimination. For men, the analysis finds a significant obesity penalty related to discrimination when applying individual fixed effects. We do not find any significant excess-weight penalty for women.

Indexed as

EfficiencyAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHealth StatusHumansIncomeMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPrejudiceSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID24903023
PMCPMC4464599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.