ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2014
Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and motor imagery in a training-based approach.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Trial
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Functional Electrical Stimulation Mimic to Gait Promotes Motor Recovery and Brain Remodeling in Acute Stroke.Behavioural neurology · 2018Trial
- The effect of combining motor imagery and electrical stimulation on improving performance in a force tracking task.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Motor imagery affects both cortical and spinal circuitry: a transcranial and trans-spinal magnetic stimulation study.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- Article
- EMG-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation for Central Facial Palsy Following Stroke: A Clinical Case Report.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Tactile versus motor imagery: differences in corticospinal excitability assessed with single-pulse TMS.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improved motor imagery skills after repetitive passive somatosensory stimulation: a parallel-group, pre-registered study.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2024Article
- Article
- Investigating the influence of functional electrical stimulation on motor imagery related μ-rhythm suppression.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Differences in motor imagery strategy change behavioral outcome.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Hand constraint reduces brain activity and affects the speed of verbal responses on semantic tasks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improves Activities of Daily Living Post Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2022Review
- Non-invasive brain-spine interface: Continuous control of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation using EEG.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Model-Based Analyses for the Causal Relationship Between Post-stroke Impairments and Functional Brain Connectivity Regarding the Effects of Kinesthetic Illusion Therapy Combined With Conventional Exercise.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Modulates Cortical Beta-Band Activity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Entraining Alpha Activity Using Visual Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Feasibility Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Effects of Leg Motor Imagery Combined With Electrical Stimulation on Plasticity of Corticospinal Excitability and Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Investigation of Optimal Afferent Feedback Modality for Inducing Neural Plasticity with A Self-Paced Brain-Computer Interface.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
methodsEight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition.
resultsMEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES.
conclusionsMEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.