Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24902068›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2014

Back to the future with phenotypic screening.

Marguerite Prior, Chandramouli Chiruta, Antonio Currais, Josh Goldberg, Justin Ramsey, Richard Dargusch, Pamela A Maher, David Schubert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Small molecule C381 targets the lysosome to reduce inflammation and ameliorate disease in models of neurodegeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marguerite PriorCellular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla, California 92037-1002, United States.
Chandramouli Chiruta
Antonio Currais
Josh Goldberg
Justin Ramsey
Richard Dargusch
Pamela A Maher
David Schubert
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Pan-Lipoxygenase Inhibitors for CNS DiseaseR01AG035055 · NIA · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SCHUBERT, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG035055NIA NIH HHS R01-AG035055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no disease-modifying drugs for any old age associated neurodegenerative disease or stroke. This is at least in part due to the failure of drug developers to recognize that the vast majority of neurodegenerative diseases arise from a confluence of multiple toxic insults that accumulate during normal aging and interact with genetic and environmental risk factors. Thus, it is unlikely that the current single target approach based upon rare dominant mutations or even a few preselected targets is going to yield useful drugs for these conditions. Therefore, the identification of drug candidates for neurodegeneration should be based upon their efficacy in phenotypic screening assays that reflect the biology of the aging brain, not a single, preselected target. It is argued here that this approach to drug discovery is the most likely to produce safe and effective drugs for neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAgingAnimalsBrainDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24902068
PMCPMC4102969
OpenAlexW2010708841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.