Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24901835›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Are in vitro methods for the detection of endocrine potentials in the aquatic environment predictive for in vivo effects? Outcomes of the Projects SchussenAktiv and SchussenAktivplus in the Lake Constance Area, Germany.

Anja Henneberg, Katrin Bender, Ludek Blaha, Sabrina Giebner, Bertram Kuch, Heinz-R Köhler, Diana Maier, Jörg Oehlmann, Doreen Richter, Marco Scheurer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproduction and breast cancer risk.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anja HennebergAnimal Physiological Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Katrin BenderDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ludek BlahaFaculty of Science, RECETOX, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Sabrina GiebnerDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Bertram KuchInstitute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Heinz-R KöhlerAnimal Physiological Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Diana MaierAnimal Physiological Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörg OehlmannDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Doreen RichterWater Technology Center Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Marco ScheurerWater Technology Center Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ulrike Schulte-OehlmannDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Agnes SieratowiczDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simone ZiebartDepartment Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Rita TriebskornAnimal Physiological Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies about endocrine pollution in the aquatic environment reveal changes in the reproduction system of biota. We analysed endocrine activities in two rivers in Southern Germany using three approaches: (1) chemical analyses, (2) in vitro bioassays, and (3) in vivo investigations in fish and snails. Chemical analyses were based on gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. For in vitro analyses of endocrine potentials in water, sediment, and waste water samples, we used the E-screen assay (human breast cancer cells MCF-7) and reporter gene assays (human cell line HeLa-9903 and MDA-kb2). In addition, we performed reproduction tests with the freshwater mudsnail Potamopyrgus antipodarum to analyse water and sediment samples. We exposed juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta f. fario) to water downstream of a wastewater outfall (Schussen River) or to water from a reference site (Argen River) to investigate the vitellogenin production. Furthermore, two feral fish species, chub (Leuciscus cephalus) and spirlin (Alburnoides bipunctatus), were caught in both rivers to determine their gonadal maturity and the gonadosomatic index. Chemical analyses provided only little information about endocrine active substances, whereas the in vitro assays revealed endocrine potentials in most of the samples. In addition to endocrine potentials, we also observed toxic potentials (E-screen/reproduction test) in waste water samples, which could interfere with and camouflage endocrine effects. The results of our in vivo tests were mostly in line with the results of the in vitro assays and revealed a consistent reproduction-disrupting (reproduction tests) and an occasional endocrine action (vitellogenin levels) in both investigated rivers, with more pronounced effects for the Schussen river (e.g. a lower gonadosomatic index). We were able to show that biological in vitro assays for endocrine potentials in natural stream water reasonably reflect reproduction and endocrine disruption observed in snails and field-exposed fish, respectively.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineEcotoxicologyEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental MonitoringFishesGermanyHumansIn Vitro TechniquesRiversSnailsVitellogeninsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEndocrine DisruptorsVitellogeninsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID24901835
PMCPMC4047013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.