Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24901648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Identification of divergent protein domains by combining HMM-HMM comparisons and co-occurrence detection.

Amel Ghouila, Isabelle Florent, Fatma Zahra Guerfali, Nicolas Terrapon, Dhafer Laouini, Sadok Ben Yahia, Olivier Gascuel, Laurent Bréhélin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Domain prediction with probabilistic directional context.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amel GhouilaInstitut de Biologie Computationnelle, LIRMM, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France; Computer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Isabelle FlorentCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR7245 CNRS-MNHN, Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Micro-organismes, Adaptation des Protozoaires à leur Environnent, Paris, France.
Fatma Zahra GuerfaliInstitut Pasteur de Tunis, LR11IPT02, Laboratory of Transmission, Control and Immunobiology of Infections (LTCII), Tunis-Belvédère, Tunisia; Université Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nicolas TerraponCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS UMR 7257, AFMB, Marseille, France.
Dhafer LaouiniInstitut Pasteur de Tunis, LR11IPT02, Laboratory of Transmission, Control and Immunobiology of Infections (LTCII), Tunis-Belvédère, Tunisia; Université Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sadok Ben YahiaComputer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Olivier GascuelInstitut de Biologie Computationnelle, LIRMM, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Laurent BréhélinInstitut de Biologie Computationnelle, LIRMM, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of protein domains is a key step for understanding protein function. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have proved to be a powerful tool for this task. The Pfam database notably provides a large collection of HMMs which are widely used for the annotation of proteins in sequenced organisms. This is done via sequence/HMM comparisons. However, this approach may lack sensitivity when searching for domains in divergent species. Recently, methods for HMM/HMM comparisons have been proposed and proved to be more sensitive than sequence/HMM approaches in certain cases. However, these approaches are usually not used for protein domain discovery at a genome scale, and the benefit that could be expected from their utilization for this problem has not been investigated. Using proteins of P. falciparum and L. major as examples, we investigate the extent to which HMM/HMM comparisons can identify new domain occurrences not already identified by sequence/HMM approaches. We show that although HMM/HMM comparisons are much more sensitive than sequence/HMM comparisons, they are not sufficiently accurate to be used as a standalone complement of sequence/HMM approaches at the genome scale. Hence, we propose to use domain co-occurrence--the general domain tendency to preferentially appear along with some favorite domains in the proteins--to improve the accuracy of the approach. We show that the combination of HMM/HMM comparisons and co-occurrence domain detection boosts protein annotations. At an estimated False Discovery Rate of 5%, it revealed 901 and 1098 new domains in Plasmodium and Leishmania proteins, respectively. Manual inspection of part of these predictions shows that it contains several domain families that were missing in the two organisms. All new domain occurrences have been integrated in the EuPathDomains database, along with the GO annotations that can be deduced.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMarkov ChainsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityProteins

Identifiers

PMID24901648
PMCPMC4046975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.