Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24901463›Full record

Trial reportAIDS patient care and STDs2014

Comparison of adherence monitoring tools and correlation to virologic failure in a pediatric HIV clinical trial.

Jintana Intasan, Torsak Bunupuradah, Saphonn Vonthanak, Pope Kosalaraksa, Rawiwan Hansudewechakul, Suparat Kanjanavanit, Chaiwat Ngampiyaskul, Jurai Wongsawat, Wicharn Luesomboon, Tanakorn Apornpong and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Relationship between viral load and behavioral measures of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in children living with human immunodeficiency virus in Latin America.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jintana Intasan1 HIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center , Bangkok, Thailand .
Torsak Bunupuradah
Saphonn Vonthanak
Pope Kosalaraksa
Rawiwan Hansudewechakul
Suparat Kanjanavanit
Chaiwat Ngampiyaskul
Jurai Wongsawat
Wicharn Luesomboon
Tanakorn Apornpong
Stephen Kerr
Jintanat Ananworanich
Thanyawee Puthanakit
PREDICT Study Group

Funding

Treatment of HIV/Tuberculosis Co-DiseaseU19AI053741 · NIAID · HIV-NAT, THE THAI RED CROSS AIDS RCH CTR · PI RUXRUNGTHAM, KIAT · 2004 to 2010
$6.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI053741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus on a gold standard for monitoring adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). We compared different adherence monitoring tools in predicting virologic failure as part of a clinical trial. HIV-infected Thai and Cambodian children aged 1-12 years (N=207) were randomized to immediate-ART or deferred-ART until CD4% <15%. Virologic failure (VF) was defined as HIV-RNA >1000 copies/mL after ≥6 months of ART. Adherence monitoring tools were: (1) announced pill count, (2) PACTG adherence questionnaire (form completed by caregivers), and (3) child self-report (self-reporting from children or caregivers to direct questioning by investigators during the clinic visit) of any missed doses in the last 3 days and in the period since the last visit. The Kappa statistic was used to describe agreement between each tool. The median age at ART initiation was 7 years with median CD4% 17% and HIV-RNA 5.0 log(10)copies/mL and 92% received zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine. Over 144 weeks, 13% had VF. Mean adherence by announced pill count before VF in VF children was 92% compared to 98% in children without VF (p=0.03). Kappa statistics indicated slight to fair agreement between tools. In multivariate analysis adjusting for gender, treatment arm ethnicity and caregiver education, significant predictors of VF were poor adherence by announced pill count (OR 4.56; 95%CI 1.78-11.69), reporting any barrier to adherence in the PACTG adherence questionnaire (OR 7.08; 95%CI 2.42-20.73), and reporting a missed dose in the 24 weeks since the last HIV-RNA assessment (OR 8.64; 95%CI 1.96-38.04). In conclusion, we recommend the child self-report of any missed doses since last visit for use in HIV research and in routine care settings, because it is easy and quick to administer and a strong association with development of VF.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringViral LoadAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleParentsPredictive Value of TestsRNA, ViralSelf ReportAnti-Retroviral AgentsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24901463
PMCPMC4046210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.