Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24901252›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Sequence of a complete chicken BG haplotype shows dynamic expansion and contraction of two gene lineages with particular expression patterns.

Jan Salomonsen, John A Chattaway, Andrew C Y Chan, Aimée Parker, Samuel Huguet, Denise A Marston, Sally L Rogers, Zhiguang Wu, Adrian L Smith, Karen Staines and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Jan SalomonsenBasel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John A ChattawayDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andrew C Y ChanDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Aimée ParkerDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Samuel HuguetDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Denise A MarstonPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom.
Sally L RogersPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom.
Zhiguang WuPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom.
Adrian L SmithPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom; Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Karen StainesPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom.
Colin ButterPirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom.
Patricia RiegertBasel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland.
Olli VainioBasel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Oulu and Nordlab, Oulu, Finland.
Line NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bernd KaspersInstitute for Animal Physiology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Fengtang YangWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Rima ZoorobInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Embryology, CNRS UMR 7128, Nogent-sur-Marne, France; Institute Andre Lwoff, CNRS FRE 2937, Villejuif, France.
Francois GuillemotInstitute Andre Lwoff, CNRS FRE 2937, Villejuif, France.
Charles AuffrayInstitute Andre Lwoff, CNRS FRE 2937, Villejuif, France.
Stephan BeckWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Karsten SkjødtBasel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Cancer and Inflammation, University of South Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jim KaufmanBasel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Pirbright Institute (formerly Institute for Animal Health), Compton, United Kingdom; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
The Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWellcome Sanger Institute · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Oulu · FIUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001423Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G19438/2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089305Wellcome Trust RG49834Wellcome Trust WT098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genes important in immunity are found as multigene families. The butyrophilin genes are members of the B7 family, playing diverse roles in co-regulation and perhaps in antigen presentation. In humans, a fixed number of butyrophilin genes are found in and around the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and show striking association with particular autoimmune diseases. In chickens, BG genes encode homologues with somewhat different domain organisation. Only a few BG genes have been characterised, one involved in actin-myosin interaction in the intestinal brush border, and another implicated in resistance to viral diseases. We characterise all BG genes in B12 chickens, finding a multigene family organised as tandem repeats in the BG region outside the MHC, a single gene in the MHC (the BF-BL region), and another single gene on a different chromosome. There is a precise cell and tissue expression for each gene, but overall there are two kinds, those expressed by haemopoietic cells and those expressed in tissues (presumably non-haemopoietic cells), correlating with two different kinds of promoters and 5' untranslated regions (5'UTR). However, the multigene family in the BG region contains many hybrid genes, suggesting recombination and/or deletion as major evolutionary forces. We identify BG genes in the chicken whole genome shotgun sequence, as well as by comparison to other haplotypes by fibre fluorescence in situ hybridisation, confirming dynamic expansion and contraction within the BG region. Thus, the BG genes in chickens are undergoing much more rapid evolution compared to their homologues in mammals, for reasons yet to be understood.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBlood Group AntigensButyrophilinsChickensGenomeHaplotypesMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMembrane GlycoproteinsMultigene FamilySequence Analysis, DNASequence HomologyTandem Repeat SequencesBlood Group AntigensButyrophilinsMembrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID24901252
PMCPMC4046983
OpenAlexW2135716845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.