Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24900149›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Usefulness of Integrated PET/MRI in Head and Neck Cancer: A Preliminary Study.

Soo Jin Lee, Hyo Jung Seo, Gi Jeong Cheon, Ji Hoon Kim, E Edmund Kim, Keon Wook Kang, Jin Chul Paeng, June-Key Chung, Dong Soo Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. KSNM60 in Clinical Nuclear Oncology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  5. Are Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Sequences Needed in SimultaneousAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prognostic value of simultaneousEJNMMI research · 2018
    Article
  9. PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT?Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2017
    Review
  10. FDG Whole-Body PET/MRI in Oncology: a Systematic Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PET/MRI in Oncological Imaging: State of the Art.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Optimized imaging of the midface and orbits.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soo Jin LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
Hyo Jung SeoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, WCU Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gi Jeong CheonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
Ji Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
E Edmund KimDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, WCU Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ; Department of Radiological Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA USA.
Keon Wook KangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Chul PaengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
June-Key ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Soo LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongun-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, WCU Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe new modality of an integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) has recently been introduced but not validated. Our objective was to evaluate clinical performance of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/MRI in patients with head and neck cancer.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted between January 2013 and February 2013. Ten patients (eight men, two women; mean age, 61.4 ± 13.4 years) with histologically proven head and neck tumors were enrolled. Whole-body PET/MRI and regional positron emission tomography (PET) with dedicated MRI were sequentially obtained. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis and contrast enhancement were analyzed. A total of ten whole-body positron emission tomography (PET), ten regional positron emission tomography (PET), ten dedicated MRI and ten regional PET/gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (Gd)-MRI images were analyzed for initial staging. Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/MRI with a consensus. One radiologist analyzed dedicated MRI. The primary lesions and number of metastatic lymph nodes analyzed from each image were compared.

resultsEight patients were diagnosed with head and neck cancer (one tongue cancer, four tonsillar cancers, one nasopharyngeal cancer and two hypopharyngeal cancers) by histological diagnosis. Two benign tumors (pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor) were diagnosed with surgical operation. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) and regional positron emission tomography (PET) attenuated by MRI showed good image quality for the lesion detection. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) and regional positron emission tomography (PET) detected ten primary sites and compensated for a missed lesion on dedicated MRI. A discordant number of suspicious lymph node metastases was noted according to the different images; 22, 16, 39 and 40 in the whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) only, dedicated MR, regional positron emission tomography (PET) only and regional PET/Gd-MRI, respectively. There was no distant metastasis based on analysis of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) and whole-body PET/Dixon-volume interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE) MRI. Regional PET/Gd-MRI combined with whole-body PET/MRI modified staging in three patients. Lesions of primary tumor and suspicious metastasis were well detected on both value of SUVmax and visual analysis. The regional PET/Gd-MRI combined with whole-body PET/MRI showed convenient clinical staging performance compared with positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI alone.

conclusionIn this preliminary study, PET attenuated by MRI showed good image quality to detect lesions. And whole-body PET/MRI as a single modality was feasible for staging in a clinical setting. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET), regional positron emission tomography (PET), dedicated MRI and regional PET/Gd-MRI showed discordant results in lesion detection. These discordant results might be synergistic effect for accurate staging.

Indexed as

Head and neck cancerIntegrated PET/MRIMRIOncologyPET

Identifiers

PMID24900149
PMCPMC4028474
OpenAlexW2050074391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.