Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24899817›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2014

Corticosteroids in the treatment of dengue shock syndrome.

Senaka Rajapakse, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Sachith Maduranga, Anoja Chamarie Rajapakse

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carica papaya extract in dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cytokine Storm Syndrome Associated with Hemorrhagic Fever and Other Viruses.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Severe dengue in the intensive care unit.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Recent Advances in Dengue: Relevance to Puerto Rico.Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Senaka RajapakseDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Chaturaka RodrigoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sachith MadurangaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Anoja Chamarie RajapakseKings Mill Hospital, Sherwood Forest NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, UK.
University of Colombo · LKKings Mill Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in over 100 countries worldwide, and its incidence is on the rise. The pathophysiological basis for the development of severe dengue, characterized by plasma leakage and the "shock syndrome" are poorly understood. No specific treatment or vaccine is available, and careful monitoring and judicious administration of fluids forms the mainstay of management at present. It is postulated that vascular endothelial dysfunction, induced by cytokine and chemical mediators, is an important mechanism of plasma leakage. Although corticosteroids are potent modulators of the immune system, their role in pharmacological doses in modulating the purported immunological effects that take place in severe dengue has been a subject of controversy. The key evidence related to the role of corticosteroids for various manifestations of dengue are reviewed here. In summary, there is currently no high-quality evidence supporting the beneficial effects of corticosteroids for treatment of shock, prevention of serious complications, or increasing platelet counts. Non-randomized trials of corticosteroids given as rescue medication for severe shock have shown possible benefit. Nonetheless, the evidence base is small, and good-quality trials are lacking. We reiterate the need for well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled trials of corticosteroids for the treatment of dengue shock.

Indexed as

corticosteroidsdenguedengue shockshockthrombocytopeniavascular leak

Identifiers

PMID24899817
PMCPMC4038529
OpenAlexW2003050893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.