Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24899719›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Response normalization in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus as a possible mechanism for saccadic averaging.

Corinne R Vokoun, Xin Huang, Meyer B Jackson, Michele A Basso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alpha-Band Activity Tracks Reflexive Changes in the Breadth of the Zoom Lens of Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  6. Effects of normalized summation in the visual illusion of extent.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Normal Topography and Binocularity of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. How is visual salience computed in the brain? Insights from behaviour, neurobiology and modelling.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. A Model of the Superior Colliculus Predicts Fixation Locations during Scene Viewing and Visual Search.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corinne R VokounMolecular and Cellular Pharmacology Training Program and.
Xin HuangDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 and.
Meyer B JacksonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 and.
Michele A BassoDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Neurobiology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90025 mbasso@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF THE BOSS TRANSMEMBRANE LIGANDR01EY010199 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Helmut J Kramer · 1994 to 2026
$9.7M
Neural Codes Underlying Visual SegmentationR01EY022443 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HUANG, XIN · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY1019963NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the brain decide where to look? Neuronal networks within the superior colliculus (SC) encode locations of intended eye movements. When faced with multiple targets, the relative activities of neuronal populations compete for the selection of a saccade. However, the computational principles underlying saccadic choices remain poorly understood. We used voltage imaging of slices of rat SC to record circuit dynamics of population responses to single- and dual-site electrical stimulation to begin to reveal some of the principles of how populations of neurons interact. Stimulation of two distant sites simultaneously within the SC produced two distinct peaks of activity, whereas stimulation of two nearby sites simultaneously exhibited a single, merged peak centered between the two sites. The distances required to produce merged peaks of activity corresponded to target separations that evoked averaging saccades in humans performing a corresponding dual target task. The merged activity was well accounted for by a linear weighed summation and a divisive normalization of the responses evoked by the single-site stimulations. Interestingly, the merging of activity occurred within the superficial SC, suggesting a novel pathway for saccadic eye movement choice.

Indexed as

SaccadesAction PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationIn Vitro TechniquesNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhotic StimulationRatsSuperior Colliculiglobal effectnonlinear interactionssaccade directionvoltage imagingweighted summation

Identifiers

PMID24899719
PMCPMC4044254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.