Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24899268›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2014

Surgical vs medical treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial.

Anita P Courcoulas, Bret H Goodpaster, Jessie K Eagleton, Steven H Belle, Melissa A Kalarchian, Wei Lang, Frederico G S Toledo, John M Jakicic

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 112 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01047735 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Trial to Compare Surgical and Medical Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes (Triabetes) - Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs. Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes ARMMST2D)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2009 to 2028Enrolled69ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus, ObesityArmsRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery, Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Lifestyle Weight Loss Intervention
NCT02328599 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Consortium Evaluating the Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled In a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical Management

TypeobservationalSponsorAli AminianRan2018 to 2024Enrolled262ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus, ObesityArmsBariatric surgery involving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Bariatric surgery involving Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, Bariatric surgery involving Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost-effectiveness of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review of economic evaluations.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anita P CourcoulasDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bret H GoodpasterDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute, Florida Hospital Translational Research Institute, Orlando.
Jessie K EagletonDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Steven H BelleDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Melissa A KalarchianDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania7School of Nursing, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Wei LangDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Frederico G S ToledoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John M JakicicDepartment of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
A Randomized Trial to Compare Surgical and Medical Treatments for Type 2 DiabetesRC1DK086037 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COURCOULAS, ANITA P · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
A Randomized Trial to Compare Surgical and Medical Treatments for Type 2 DiabetesR01DK095128 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COURCOULAS, ANITA P · 2012 to 2014
$879k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIDDK NIH HHS 1RC1DK086037-01NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095128NIDDK NIH HHS RC1 DK086037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMany questions remain unanswered about the role of bariatric surgery for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

objectiveTo determine feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and compare initial outcomes of bariatric surgery and a structured weight loss program for treating T2DM in participants with grades I and II obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA 12-month, 3-arm RCT at a single center including 69 participants aged 25 to 55 years with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 30 to 40 and T2DM.

interventionsRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and an intensive lifestyle weight loss intervention (LWLI). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes in the intention-to-treat cohort were feasibility and effectiveness measured by weight loss and improvements in glycemic control.

resultsOf 667 potential participants who underwent screening, 69 (10.3%) were randomized. Among the randomized participants, 30 (43%) had grade I obesity, and 56 (81%) were women. Mean (SD) age was 47.3 (6.4) years and hemoglobin A1c level, 7.9% (2.0%). After randomization, 7 participants (10%) refused to undergo their allocated intervention (3 RYGB, 1 LAGB, and 3 LWLI), and 1 RYGB participant was excluded for current smoking. Twenty participants underwent RYGB; 21, LAGB; and 20, LWLI, with 12-month retention rates of 90%, 86%, and 70%, respectively. In the intention-to-treat cohort with multiple imputation for missing data, RYGB participants had the greatest mean weight loss from baseline (27.0%; 95% CI, 30.8-23.3) compared with LAGB (17.3%; 95% CI, 21.1-13.5) and LWLI (10.2%; 95% CI, 14.8-5.61) (P < .001). Partial and complete remission of T2DM were 50% and 17%, respectively, in the RYGB group and 27% and 23%, respectively, in the LAGB group (P < .001 and P = .047 between groups for partial and complete remission), with no remission in the LWLI group. Significant reductions in use of antidiabetics occurred in both surgical groups. No deaths were noted. The 3 serious adverse events included 1 ulcer treated medically in the RYGB group and 2 rehospitalizations for dehydration in the LAGB group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study highlights several potential challenges to successful completion of a larger RCT for treatment of T2DM and obesity in patients with a body mass index of 30 to 40, including the difficulties associated with recruiting and randomizing patients to surgical vs nonsurgical interventions. Preliminary results show that RYGB was the most effective treatment, followed by LAGB for weight loss and T2DM outcomes at 1 year.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01047735.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryWeight LossAdultBody Mass IndexComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24899268
PMCPMC4106661
OpenAlexW2028913390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.