ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2014
Atom-based 3D-QSAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation assessment of inhibitors for thyroid hormone receptor α and β.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of non-genomic actions of thyroid hormones on the anaesthetic effect of propofol.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) for inhibitors of thyroid hormone receptors (TR) α and (TR) β was studied. The training set of the TRα model generated a correlation coefficient (R(2)) = 0.9535, with standard deviation (SD) = 0.3016. From the test set of the TRα model, a Q(2) value for the predicted activities (= 0.4303), squared correlation (random selection R(2)-CV = 0.6929), Pearson-R (= 0.7294) and root mean square error (RMSE = 0.6342) were calculated. The P-value for TRα (= 1.411e-96) and TRβ (= 2.108e-165) models indicate a high degree of self-reliance. For the TRβ model, the training set yielded R(2) = 0.9424 with SD = 0.3719. From the test set of TRβ, Q(2) value (= 0.5336), the squared correlation (R(2)-CV = 0.7201), the Pearson-R (= 0.7852) and RMSE for test set predictions (= 0.8630) all strengthen the good predictive competence of the QSAR model derived. Examination of internal as well as external validation supports the rationality and good predictive ability of the best model. Molecular docking explained the conformations of molecules and important amino acid residues at the docking pocket, and a molecular dynamics simulation study further uncovered the binding process and validated the rationality of docking results. The findings not only lead to a better understanding of interactions between these antagonists and thyroid hormone receptors α and β, but also provide valuable information about the impact of structure on activity that will be very beneficial in the design of novel antagonists with preferred activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.