Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898748›Full record

ReviewScience translational medicine2014

Strategies for cardiac regeneration and repair.

Zhiqiang Lin, William T Pu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Healing mechanisms of Galectin-1 in the ischemic heart.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026
    Review
  4. SystemicBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modified mRNA Therapeutics for Heart Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Mettl3-mediated meLife · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microneedle-mediated therapy for cardiovascular diseases.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiqiang LinDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
William T PuDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. wpu@enders.tch.harvard.edu.

Funding

Microenvironmental control of progenitors in organ dysfunction and repairU01HL100401 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI OLSON, ERIC N, SCHNEIDER, JAY W · 2009 to 2015
$8.3M
Epicardial progenitors in the developing and postnatal heartR01HL094683 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI PU, WILLIAM TSWENCHING · 2009 to 2016
$3.7M
YAP1 Regulation of cardiomyocyte proliferation, function, and regenerationR01HL116461 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI PU, WILLIAM TSWENCHING · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094683NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116461NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure is a growing epidemic caused by cardiomyocyte depletion. Current therapies prolong survival by protecting remaining cardiomyocytes but are unable to overcome the fundamental problem of regenerating lost cardiomyocytes. Several strategies for promoting heart regeneration have emerged from decades of intensive study. Although some of these strategies remain confined to basic research, others are beginning to be tested in humans. We review strategies for cardiac regeneration and summarize progress of related clinical trials.

Indexed as

Wound HealingCellular ReprogrammingHeartHumansMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID24898748
PMCPMC4280908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.