Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898561›Full record

ArticleClinical hemorheology and microcirculation2015

Increased erythrocyte adhesion to VCAM-1 during pulsatile flow: Application of a microfluidic flow adhesion bioassay.

Jennell White, Moira Lancelot, Sharada Sarnaik, Patrick Hines

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Periodic Flows in Microfluidics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microfluidic methods to advance mechanistic understanding and translational research in sickle cell disease.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Blood rheology biomarkers in sickle cell disease.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Red blood cells: the forgotten player in hemostasis and thrombosis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennell WhiteDepartment of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Moira LancelotDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sharada SarnaikDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Patrick HinesDepartment of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Children's Hospital of Michigan · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by microvascular occlusion mediated by adhesive interactions of sickle erythrocytes (SSRBCs) to the endothelium. Most in vitro flow adhesion assays measure SSRBC adhesion during continuous flow, although in vivo SSRBC adhesive interactions occur during pulsatile flow. Using a well-plate microfluidic flow adhesion system, we demonstrate that isolated SSRBCs adhere to vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) at greater levels during pulsatile versus continuous flow. A significant increase in adhesive interactions was observed between all pulse frequencies 1 Hz to 2 Hz (60-120 beats/min) when compared to non-pulsatile flow. Adhesion of isolated SSRBCs and whole blood during pulsatile flow was unaffected by protein kinase A (PKA) inhibition, and exposure of SSRBCs to pulsatile flow did not affect the intrinsic adhesive properties of SSRBCs. The cell type responsible for increased adhesion of whole blood varied from patient to patient. We conclude that low flow periods of the pulse cycle allow more adhesive interactions between sickle erythrocytes and VCAM-1, and sickle erythrocyte adhesion in the context of whole blood may better reflect physiologic cellular interactions. The microfluidic flow adhesion bioassay used in this study may have applications for clinical assessment of sickle erythrocyte adhesion during pulsatile flow.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnemia, Sickle CellCell AdhesionChildChild, PreschoolEndothelium, VascularHumansMicrofluidicsPulsatile FlowVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1adhesionerythrocytemicrofluidicsPulsatile flowsickle cell diseasevariable shearVCAM-1VLA-4

Identifiers

PMID24898561
PMCPMC4923762
OpenAlexW2220390677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.