Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898458›Full record

ReviewTransfusion2014

Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells: a review of clinical applications and manufacturing practices.

Ratti Ram Sharma, Kathryn Pollock, Allison Hubel, David McKenna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 218 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Chronological Age Affects MSC Senescence In Vitro-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ratti Ram SharmaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandīgarh, India.
Kathryn Pollock
Allison Hubel
David McKenna

Funding

Multicomponent solutions for the preservation of cell therapy productsR01EB023880 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUBEL, ALLISON · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
Integrated training in development and clinical practice of cell-based therapiesR25HL128372 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUBEL, ALLISON, MCKENNA, DAVID HURLEY · 2015 to 2019
$553k
Technology platform for development of multi-component preservation solutionR21EB016247 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUBEL, ALLISON · 2013 to 2014
$387k
NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL128372NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023880NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently generated great interest in the fields of regenerative medicine and immunotherapy due to their unique biologic properties. In this review we attempt to provide an overview of the current clinical status of MSC therapy, primarily focusing on immunomodulatory and regenerative or tissue repair applications of MSCs. In addition, current manufacturing is reviewed with attention to variation in practices (e.g., starting material, approach to culture and product testing). There is considerable variation among the 218 clinical trials assessed here; variations include proposed mechanisms of action, optimal dosing strategy, and route of administration. To ensure the greatest likelihood of success in clinical trials as the field progresses, attention must be given to the optimization of MSC culture.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCell SeparationClinical Trials as TopicFetal BloodGenomic InstabilityGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoiesisHumansImmunomodulationMesenchymal Stem CellsQuality ControlRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID24898458
PMCPMC6364749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.