Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898342›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014

Intensive care unit admission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patient information and the physician's decision-making process.

Matthieu Schmidt, Alexandre Demoule, Emmanuelle Deslandes-Boutmy, Marine Chaize, Sandra de Miranda, Nicolas Bèle, Nicolas Roche, Elie Azoulay, Thomas Similowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The relationship between ventilator-associated pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is the current evidence?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is It Essential to Consider Respiratory Dynamics?Korean journal of critical care medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu Schmidt
Alexandre Demoule
Emmanuelle Deslandes-Boutmy
Marine Chaize
Sandra de Miranda
Nicolas Bèle
Nicolas Roche
Elie Azoulay
Thomas Similowski
Hôpital Saint-Louis · FRHôpital Cochin · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionICU admission is required in more than 25% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at some time during the course of the disease. However, only limited information is available on how physicians communicate with COPD patients about ICU admission.

methodsCOPD patients and relatives from 19 French ICUs were interviewed at ICU discharge about their knowledge of COPD. French pulmonologists self-reported their practices for informing and discussing intensive care treatment preferences with COPD patients. Finally, pulmonologists and ICU physicians reported barriers and facilitators for transfer of COPD patients to the ICU and to propose invasive mechanical ventilation.

resultsSelf-report questionnaires were filled in by 126 COPD patients and 102 relatives, and 173 pulmonologists and 135 ICU physicians were interviewed. For 41% (n = 39) of patients and 54% (n = 51) of relatives, ICU admission had never been expected prior to admission. One half of patients were not routinely informed by their pulmonologist about possible ICU admission at some time during the course of COPD. Moreover, treatment options (that is, non-invasive ventilation, intubation and mechanical ventilation or tracheotomy) were not explained to COPD patients during regular pulmonologist visits. Pulmonologists and ICU physician have different perceptions of the decision-making process pertaining to ICU admission and intubation.

conclusionsThe information provided by pulmonologists to patients and families concerning the prognosis of COPD, the risks of ICU admission and specific care could be improved in order to deliver ICU care in accordance with the patient's personal values and preferences. Given the discrepancies in the decision-making process between pulmonologists and intensivists, a more collaborative approach should probably be discussed.

Indexed as

CommunicationCritical CareDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsPulmonary MedicineFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicProfessional-Family RelationsPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID24898342
PMCPMC4229873
OpenAlexW2159573855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.