Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898187›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2014

Current role of PCNL in pediatric urolithiasis.

Ravindra B Sabnis, Jaspreet S Chhabra, Arvind P Ganpule, Sachin Abrol, Mahesh R Desai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ravindra B SabnisDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, 387 001, India, rbsabnis@gmail.com.
Jaspreet S Chhabra
Arvind P Ganpule
Sachin Abrol
Mahesh R Desai
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of pediatric stone disease has been increasing. Though there are geographical variations, there remains a common theme in that this is a high-risk population with regard to stone formation and recurrence. Consequently, it is important to keep the number of procedures performed to a minimum and to save the developing kidney from the deleterious effects of intervention. Of the number of available treatment options, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) offers a number of distinct advantages albeit with its own set of concerns. In the present article, the current literature on PCNL in pediatric urolithiasis was reviewed by a MEDLINE/PubMed search that was limited to literature in the English language, with emphasis on the current state of art in PCNL. Within the last few years, there have been improvements in radiological techniques, particularly computed tomography (CT), with dedicated reconstructions and development of scoring systems leading to better preoperative planning. Also, there has been miniaturization of instruments, particularly smaller nephroscopes, innovative sheaths and the potential to use lasers as well as smaller pneumatic and ultrasound probes. The combination of these has led to various modifications, such as miniperc, microperc and ultra-mini perc techniques. These modifications have been shown to be associated with a decrease in morbidity and high clearance rates. In this article, we analyze the current role of PCNL and its modifications, in terms of the indications, techniques, results, and complications in management of pediatric urolithiasis.

Indexed as

Nephrostomy, PercutaneousChildEquipment DesignHumansUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID24898187
OpenAlexW2030388124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.