Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24898072›Full record

ReviewOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2014

Electronic nicotine delivery systems ("e-cigarettes"): review of safety and smoking cessation efficacy.

Paul Truman Harrell, Vani Nath Simmons, John Bernard Correa, Tapan Ashvin Padhya, Thomas Henry Brandon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health Effects of Electronic Cigarettes: An Umbrella Review and Methodological Considerations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Otolaryngology Resident Education and Perceptions of e-cigarettes.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul Truman HarrellDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA Paul.Harrell@Moffitt.org.
Vani Nath SimmonsDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
John Bernard CorreaDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Tapan Ashvin PadhyaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Thomas Henry BrandonDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Extended Self-Help for Smoking CessationR01CA134347 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Smoking Relapse-Prevention Intervention for Cancer PatientsR01CA154596 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SIMMONS, VANI N · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134347NCI NIH HHS R01CA134347NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154596NCI NIH HHS R01CA154596NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314NCI NIH HHS R25CA090314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCigarette smoking is common among cancer patients and is associated with negative outcomes. Electronic nicotine delivery systems ("e-cigarettes") are rapidly growing in popularity and use, but there is limited information on their safety or effectiveness in helping individuals quit smoking. DATA SOURCES: The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, and additional sources for published empirical data on safety and use of electronic cigarettes as an aid to quit smoking. REVIEW

methodsWe conducted a structured search of the current literature up to and including November 2013.

resultsE-cigarettes currently vary widely in their contents and are sometimes inconsistent with labeling. Compared to tobacco cigarettes, available evidence suggests that e-cigarettes are often substantially lower in toxic content, cytotoxicity, associated adverse effects, and secondhand toxicity exposure. Data on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking are suggestive but ultimately inconclusive.

conclusionsClinicians are advised to be aware that the use of e-cigarettes, especially among cigarette smokers, is growing rapidly. These devices are unregulated, of unknown safety, and of uncertain benefit in quitting smoking. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In the absence of further data or regulation, oncologists are advised to discuss the known and unknown safety and efficacy information on e-cigarettes with interested patients and to encourage patients to first try FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsElectronicsFemaleHumansMaleNebulizers and VaporizersSmoking CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment Outcomecarcinogense-cigaretteselectronic nicotine delivery systemsnicotinepersonal vaporizerssmokingtoxicityvapersvaping

Identifiers

PMID24898072
PMCPMC4376316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.