Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24896652›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A dnaN plasmid shuffle strain for rapid in vivo analysis of mutant Escherichia coli β clamps provides insight into the role of clamp in umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity.

Vignesh M P Babu, Mark D Sutton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Mutant βJournal of bacteriology · 2021
    Article
  2. Elevated Levels of the Escherichia coliJournal of bacteriology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vignesh M P BabuDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America; Witebsky Center for Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Mark D SuttonDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America; Witebsky Center for Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America; Genetics, Genomics and Bioinformatics Program, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Regulation of DNA Replication and RepairR01GM066094 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SUTTON, MARK D. · 2003 to 2016
$4.0M
Regulation of DNA replication and repairR56GM066094 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SUTTON, MARK D. · 2008 to 2008
$308k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066094NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066094NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM066094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E. coli umuDC gene products participate in two temporally distinct roles: UmuD2C acts in a DNA damage checkpoint control, while UmuD'2C, also known as DNA polymerase V (Pol V), catalyzes replication past DNA lesions via a process termed translesion DNA synthesis. These different roles of the umuDC gene products are managed in part by the dnaN-encoded β sliding clamp protein. Co-overexpression of the β clamp and Pol V severely blocked E. coli growth at 30°C. We previously used a genetic assay that was independent of the ability of β clamp to support E. coli viability to isolate 8 mutant clamp proteins (βQ61K, βS107L, βD150N, βG157S, βV170M, βE202K, βM204K and βP363S) that failed to block growth at 30°C when co-overexpressed with Pol V. It was unknown whether these mutant clamps were capable of supporting E. coli viability and normal umuDC functions in vivo. The goals of this study were to answer these questions. To this end, we developed a novel dnaN plasmid shuffle assay. Using this assay, βD150N and βP363S were unable to support E. coli viability. The remaining 6 mutant clamps, each of which supported viability, were indistinguishable from β+ with respect to umuDC functions in vivo. In light of these findings, we analyzed phenotypes of strains overexpressing either β clamp or Pol V alone. The strain overexpressing β+, but not those expressing mutant β clamps, displayed slowed growth irrespective of the incubation temperature. Moreover, growth of the Pol V-expressing strain was modestly slowed at 30°, but not 42°C. Taken together, these results suggest the mutant clamps were identified due to their inability to slow growth rather than an inability to interact with Pol V. They further suggest that cold sensitivity is due, at least in part, to the combination of their individual effects on growth at 30°C.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureMutationAdaptation, BiologicalAllelesDNA DamageDNA Polymerase IIIEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene ExpressionGene OrderMicrobial ViabilityModels, MolecularPlasmidsProtein Conformationbeta subunit, DNA polymerase IIIDNA Polymerase IIIEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24896652
PMCPMC4045847
OpenAlexW2026040881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.