Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24895851›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2014

Mechanisms of cellular proteostasis: insights from single-molecule approaches.

Carlos J Bustamante, Christian M Kaiser, Rodrigo A Maillard, Daniel H Goldman, Christian A M Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases: The Many Ways to Transcribe a Gene.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mechanical properties of BiP protein determined by nano-rheology.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proteotoxicity and cardiac dysfunction.Circulation research · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos J BustamanteQB3 California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences.
Christian M Kaiser
Rodrigo A Maillard
Daniel H Goldman
Christian A M Wilson

Funding

THE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSR01GM032543 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CARLOS Jose BUSTAMANTE · 1985 to 2026
$6.4M
Single molecule analysis of nascent protein foldingK99GM086516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KAISER, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2010
$179k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM032543NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM086516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells employ a variety of strategies to maintain proteome homeostasis. Beginning during protein biogenesis, the translation machinery and a number of molecular chaperones promote correct de novo folding of nascent proteins even before synthesis is complete. Another set of molecular chaperones helps to maintain proteins in their functional, native state. Polypeptides that are no longer needed or pose a threat to the cell, such as misfolded proteins and aggregates, are removed in an efficient and timely fashion by ATP-dependent proteases. In this review, we describe how applications of single-molecule manipulation methods, in particular optical tweezers, are shedding new light on the molecular mechanisms of quality control during the life cycles of proteins.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular ChaperonesOptical TweezersProtein BiosynthesisProtein FoldingProteinsMolecular ChaperonesProteinschaperonesforce spectroscopyproteasesprotein foldingribosomeworm-like chain

Identifiers

PMID24895851
PMCPMC4620553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.