Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24895569›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Bacterial sepsis in patients with visceral leishmaniasis in Northwest Ethiopia.

Mengistu Endris, Yegnasew Takele, Desalegn Woldeyohannes, Moges Tiruneh, Rezika Mohammed, Feleke Moges, Lutgarde Lynen, Jan Jacobs, Johan van Griensven, Ermias Diro

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resistance ofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mengistu EndrisDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-2085
Yegnasew TakeleLeishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center, University of Gondar Hospital, Ethiopia.
Desalegn WoldeyohannesDepartment of Immunology and Molecular Biology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia ; Department of Public Health, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.
Moges TirunehDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.
Rezika MohammedLeishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center, University of Gondar Hospital, Ethiopia.
Feleke MogesDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-0084-3599
Lutgarde LynenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jan JacobsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-6777
Johan van GriensvenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ermias DiroDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-6323
University of Gondar · ETInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEAddis Ababa Science and Technology University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) is one of the neglected diseases affecting the poorest segment of world populations. Sepsis is one of the predictors for death of patients with VL. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with bacterial sepsis, causative agents, and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among patients with VL.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among parasitologically confirmed VL patients suspected of sepsis admitted to the University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, from February 2012 to May 2012. Blood cultures and other clinical samples were collected and cultured following the standard procedures.

resultsAmong 83 sepsis suspected VL patients 16 (19.3%) had culture confirmed bacterial sepsis. The most frequently isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus (68.8%; 11/16), including two methicillin-resistant isolates (MRSA). Patients with focal bacterial infection were more likely to have bacterial sepsis (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe prevalence of culture confirmed bacterial sepsis was high, predominantly due to S. aureus. Concurrent focal bacterial infection was associated with bacterial sepsis, suggesting that focal infections could serve as sources for bacterial sepsis among VL patients. Careful clinical evaluation for focal infections and prompt initiation of empiric antibiotic treatment appears warranted in VL patients.

Indexed as

AdultAge DistributionBacteremiaComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesEndemic DiseasesEthiopiaFemaleHumansLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleNeglected DiseasesPrevalenceRisk AssessmentSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID24895569
PMCPMC4033396
OpenAlexW2002661216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.