ArticleJournal of community genetics2014
Developing a framework for implementation of genetic services: learning from examples of testing for monogenic forms of common diseases.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mainstreaming genetics into Italian prenatal care: exploring the future implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Italian National Healthcare System using stakeholder interviews.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Simulating the Genetics Clinic of the Future - whether undergoing whole-genome sequencing shapes professional attitudes.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders.PloS one · 2022Article
- Genetic counseling in the context of Bangladesh: current scenario, challenges, and a framework for genetic service implementation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Review
- Clinical genetics in transition-a comparison of genetic services in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Patient perspectives on the diagnostic journey to a monogenic diabetes diagnosis: Barriers and facilitators.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020Article
- Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2020Article
- Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Primary Care: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- DPD Testing Before Treatment With Fluoropyrimidines in the Amsterdam UMCs: An Evaluation of Current Pharmacogenetic Practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Stakeholder Views on Active Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy in a national healthcare system: global challenges and national solutions.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Implementation of Genetic Services: A Public Health Perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- Identification of Delivery Models for the Provision of Predictive Genetic Testing in Europe: Protocol for a Multicentre Qualitative Study and a Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- A prospective cohort study assessing clinical referral management & workforce allocation within a UK regional medical genetics service.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Barriers and facilitators for implementing a pharmacogenetic passport: lessons learned from reusing sequencing data.PharmacogenomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetics in health care is shifting, and responsibilities of genetic and nongenetic specialists are changing, requiring new guidance on how to adapt health care to advances in genetic services. This paper explores facilitators and barriers in the process of implementation of innovations in genetic health care. Furthermore, lessons learnt for optimizing development of new genetic services are summarized. Barriers and facilitators in transition processes were identified using mixed methods, including an online open-ended questionnaire among professionals and an international expert meeting. A multi-case study approach was used to explore recent experiences with innovations in genetic services in different phases of implementation. Barriers encountered in transitions in genetic service provision include the following: lack of genetic knowledge and skills among nongenetic health care providers, resistance to new divisions of responsibilities, and a need for more close collaboration and communication between geneticists and nongeneticists. Facilitating factors include the following: statutory registration of genetic specialists, availability of essential staff and equipment, and existence of registries and guidelines. Other challenges are experienced in the establishment of the appropriate legal and financial structures. A set of points to consider for genetic innovation processes is proposed, addressing, e.g., transition management and cooperation and communication strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.