ArticleEndocrine2015
Clinical implication of fasting and post-challenged plasma glucose in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
Article in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of tests for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Non-Fasting Glucose Measures and Their Clinical Significance in Diabetes Diagnosis and Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk Prediction: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Concordance Rate of Fasting Plasma Glucose (PG) and 2-hour PG post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) in Patients with New Diagnosis of Thalassemia-Related Diabetes Mellitus (Th-RDM): Implications for Clinical Practice.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Performance of fasting plasma glucose for community-based screening of undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Postprandial Plasma Glucose between 4 and 7.9 h May Be a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Diabetes.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Clinical Implications of Using Post-Challenge Plasma Glucose Levels for Early Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Older Individuals.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is the preferred test in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) to 2-h post-challenged plasma glucose (2hPG). There is little information available on the comparison between FPG and 2hPG diagnostic criteria. This study included adult participants (≥18 years old) of the NHANES 2005-2010 with FPG, 2hPG, and BMI measured. Subjects with established DM were excluded. The sensitivity of FPG and 2hPG diagnostic criteria was compared as the main outcome measure. Among 5,782 subjects, 476 subjects (8.23 %) were diagnosed with DM by either FPG, 2hPG, or both criteria. Among the subjects meeting the criterion of FPG, those with 2hPG <200 mg/dL were younger (57 ± 16 vs. 61 ± 15 years old, P < 0.05, mean ± STD) and less obese (30.81 ± 7.89 vs. 32.71 ± 6.68 kg/m(2), P < 0.05) as compared to those with 2hPG ≥200 mg/dL. Among the subjects meeting the criterion of 2hPG, those with FPG <126 mg/dL were more female (55.41 vs. 39.88 %, P < 0.0002), less obese (29.24 ± 5.83 vs. 32.71 ± 6.68 kg/m(2), P < 0.000001), lower diastolic blood pressure (67 ± 12 vs. 71 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0.02), and less family history of DM (36.35 vs. 48.47 %, P < 0.02) as compared to those with FPG ≥126 mg/dL. The sensitivity of diagnosis of DM was only 41.37 % for FPG criterion, while it was 66.53 % for 2hPG criterion. Thus, compared to 2hPG criterion, FPG criterion had a lower sensitivity detecting new cases of DM. The use of FPG criterion would more likely result in underdiagnosing DM, especially in female and less obese subjects, as compared to the use of 2hPG criterion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24895042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.