Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24894739›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Analysis of the genetics of boar taint reveals both single SNPs and regional effects.

Suzanne J Rowe, Burak Karacaören, Dirk-Jan de Koning, Boris Lukic, Nicola Hastings-Clark, Ingela Velander, Chris S Haley, Alan L Archibald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 7 countries.

Suzanne J RoweThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9RG, UK. suzanne.rowe@agresearch.co.nz.
Burak Karacaören
Dirk-Jan de Koning
Boris Lukic
Nicola Hastings-Clark
Ingela Velander
Chris S Haley
Alan L Archibald
Roslin Institute · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBDanish Agriculture and Food Council · DKUniversity of Osijek · HR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J002844/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191132Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001606Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001615Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127592696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoar taint is an offensive urine or faecal-like odour, affecting the smell and taste of cooked pork from some mature non-castrated male pigs. Androstenone and skatole in fat are the molecules responsible. In most pig production systems, males, which are not required for breeding, are castrated shortly after birth to reduce the risk of boar taint. There is evidence for genetic variation in the predisposition to boar taint.A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed to identify loci with effects on boar taint. Five hundred Danish Landrace boars with high levels of skatole in fat (>0.3 μg/g), were each matched with a litter mate with low levels of skatole and measured for androstenone. DNA from these 1,000 non-castrated boars was genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 Beadchip. After quality control, tests for SNPs associated with boar taint were performed on 938 phenotyped individuals and 44,648 SNPs. Empirical significance thresholds were set by permutation (100,000). For androstenone, a 'regional heritability approach' combining information from multiple SNPs was used to estimate the genetic variation attributable to individual autosomes.

resultsA highly significant association was found between variation in skatole levels and SNPs within the CYP2E1 gene on chromosome 14 (SSC14), which encodes an enzyme involved in degradation of skatole. Nominal significance was found for effects on skatole associated with 4 other SNPs including a region of SSC6 reported previously. Genome-wide significance was found for an association between SNPs on SSC5 and androstenone levels and nominal significance for associations with SNPs on SSC13 and SSC17. The regional analyses confirmed large effects on SSC5 for androstenone and suggest that SSC5 explains 23% of the genetic variation in androstenone. The autosomal heritability analyses also suggest that there is a large effect associated with androstenone on SSC2, not detected using GWAS.

conclusionsSignificant SNP associations were found for skatole on SSC14 and for androstenone on SSC5 in Landrace pigs. The study agrees with evidence that the CYP2E1 gene has effects on skatole breakdown in the liver. Autosomal heritability estimates can uncover clusters of smaller genetic effects that individually do not exceed the threshold for GWAS significance.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAndrostenesAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianCytochrome P-450 CYP2E1Fat BodyGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleMeatOdorantsOrchiectomyPhenotypeSkatoleSus scrofaandrost-16-en-3-oneAndrostenesCytochrome P-450 CYP2E1Skatole

Identifiers

PMID24894739
PMCPMC4059876
OpenAlexW2145938726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.