Trial reportTrials2014
An efficacy and mechanism evaluation study of Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute oRgan Dysfunction in Sepsis (LeoPARDS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03452865 (Proton Pump Inhibitors), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) as a New Strategy for Therapy in Sepsis: Clinical Trial to Reduce Severity of Organ Failure and in Vitro Experiments to Search Specific Hallmarks in Monocytes From Septic Patients and to Characterize the Mechanism of Action of PPI
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Levosimendan in septic shock in patients with biochemical evidence of cardiac dysfunction: a subgroup analysis of the LeoPARDS randomised trial.Intensive care medicine · 2019Trial
- Effect of small-dose levosimendan on mortality rates and organ functions in Chinese elderly patients with sepsis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2017Trial
- Hemodynamic effects of inotropic drugs in heart failure: A network meta-analysis of clinical trials.Medicine · 2019Article
- Acute kidney injury-an overview of diagnostic methods and clinical management.Clinical kidney journal · 2017Article
- [Levosimendan-no effect on multiorgan failure in septic shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Article
- Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy.Intensive care medicine · 2016Review
- Cardiac dysfunction in sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2016Article
- Catecholamines for inflammatory shock: a Jekyll-and-Hyde conundrum.Intensive care medicine · 2016Review
- Beneficial effects of levosimendan on survival in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiovascular surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2016Observational
- Early prevention of trauma-related infection/sepsis.Military Medical Research · 2016Review
- [Levosimendan for septic shock with takotsubo cardiomyopathy].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- Evidence about inotropes: when is enough, enough?Intensive care medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrgan dysfunction consequent to infection ('severe sepsis') is the leading cause of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). In both animal models and early clinical studies the calcium channel sensitizer levosimendan has been demonstrated to have potentially beneficial effects on organ function. The aims of the Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute oRgan Dysfunction in Sepsis (LeoPARDS) trial are to identify whether a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan will improve organ dysfunction in adults who have septic shock and to establish the safety profile of levosimendan in this group of patients. METHODS/
designThis is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial. Adults fulfilling the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to infection, and requiring vasopressor therapy, will be eligible for inclusion in the trial. Within 24 hours of meeting these inclusion criteria, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio stratified by the ICU to receive either levosimendan (0.05 to 0.2 μg.kg⁻¹.min⁻¹ or placebo for 24 hours in addition to standard care. The primary outcome measure is the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score while in the ICU. Secondary outcomes include: central venous oxygen saturations and cardiac output; incidence and severity of renal failure using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria; duration of renal replacement therapy; serum bilirubin; time to liberation from mechanical ventilation; 28-day, hospital, 3 and 6 month survival; ICU and hospital length-of-stay; and days free from catecholamine therapy. Blood and urine samples will be collected on the day of inclusion, at 24 hours, and on days 4 and 6 post-inclusion for investigation of the mechanisms by which levosimendan might improve organ function. Eighty patients will have additional blood samples taken to measure levels of levosimendan and its active metabolites OR-1896 and OR-1855. A total of 516 patients will be recruited from approximately 25 ICUs in the United Kingdom. DISCUSSION: This trial will test the efficacy of levosimendan to reduce acute organ dysfunction in adult patients who have septic shock and evaluate its biological mechanisms of action.
trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN12776039 (19 September 2013).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.