Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24894271›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2014

Evidence-based management of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Diana A Whitehead, Timothy B Gardner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pancreatic endotherapy and necrosectomy.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana A WhiteheadSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA, Diana.A.Whitehead@hitchcock.org.
Timothy B Gardner
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPancreatic necrosis may result as a complication of acute pancreatitis, often causing significant morbidity and mortality. There are many recommendations concerning the management of pancreatic necrosis, including non-operative management with supportive care and antibiotics, computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous drainage, endoscopic transluminal drainage, and operative necrosectomy. Historically, pancreatic necrosis has been treated surgically. However, surgical management of pancreatic necrosis is associated with high mortality (6-28 %) and morbidity (19-62 %). Thus, endoscopic therapy has emerged as a relatively new minimally invasive technique for treating infected and/or symptomatic pancreatic necrosis in the last decade. Although there have been two randomized trials comparing endoscopic transluminal drainage versus operative necrosectomy, there is little data regarding timing, indication, and outcomes of these procedures.

Identifiers

PMID24894271
OpenAlexW2148278362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.