Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24894163›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2016

Pilonidal sinus surgery: could we predict postoperative complications?

Marco Milone, Matteo Nd Di Minno, Paolo Bianco, Guido Coretti, Mario Musella, Francesco Milone

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Does Full Wound Rupture following Median Pilonidal Closure Alter Long-Term Recurrence Rate?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2015
    Article
  10. Sinus pilonidalis in patients of German military hospitals: a review.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco MiloneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Matteo Nd Di MinnoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Paolo BiancoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Guido CorettiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Mario MusellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Francesco MiloneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pilonidal sinus surgery could, as of now, be considered a surgery tailored more to the surgeon than to the patient. In an attempt to give to surgeons an objective instrument of decision, we have evaluated which variables could be considered predictive of postoperative complications after pilonidal sinus surgery. A prospective electronic database of all patients treated for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease was analysed. Sex, age, obesity, smoking, recurrent disease, the presence of multiple orifices and the distance between the most lateral orifice and midline were recorded and correlated with the occurrence of postoperative complications (infection and recurrence); 1006 patients were evaluated. Excision with primary mid-line closure was performed on all the patients. Mean follow-up was 7·3 ± 3·6 years. A total of 158 patients with postoperative complications (infection and/or recurrence) were recorded during this period. A multivariate analysis showed that, after adjusting for major clinical and demographic characteristics, only a recurrent disease [odds ratio (OR): 3·41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·89-6·15, P < 0·001] and the distance of lateral orifice from midline (OR: 26·3, 95% CI: 12·2-56·7, P < 0·001) were independent predictors of overall postoperative complications. Focussing on the distance from midline, the receiver operative characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the distance of lateral orifice from midline predicted 79·2% of complications and the Youden's test identified the best cut-off as 2·0 cm for this variable. An evidence-based tool for deciding on the type of surgical intervention could be developed and validated by further ad hoc prospective studies evaluating our results in comparison to other different types of surgical techniques. Our results support the use of these variables as an effective way to tailor pilonidal sinus surgery to the patient, so as to obtain the best results in patient care.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsChronic DiseaseHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilonidal SinusProspective StudiesInfectionPilonidalRecurrenceSacrococcygealSinus

Identifiers

PMID24894163
PMCPMC7949861
OpenAlexW2003260436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.