Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24894161›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2014

Impact of pre-operative positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer.

Universe Leung, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Carlos U Corvera, Michael I D'Angelica, Peter J Allen, T Peter Kingham, Ronald P DeMatteo, William R Jarnagin, Yuman Fong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Surgical management of biliary malignancy.Current problems in surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging of gallbladder carcinomas.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Technical Aspects of Gallbladder Cancer Surgery.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  9. Benign uptake ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine
    Article
  10. Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Universe LeungDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Carlos U Corvera
Michael I D'Angelica
Peter J Allen
T Peter Kingham
Ronald P DeMatteo
William R Jarnagin
Yuman Fong
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent pre-operative staging methods for gallbladder cancer (GBC) are suboptimal in detecting metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) may have a role but data are lacking.

methodsPatients with GBC and PET assessed by a hepatobiliary surgeon in clinic between January 2001 and June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonace imaging (MRI) were correlated with PET scans and analysed for evidence of metastatic or locally unresectable disease. Medical records were reviewed to determine if PET scanning was helpful by preventing non-therapeutic surgery or enabling resection in patients initially deemed unresectable.

resultsThere were 100 patients including 63 incidental GBC. Thirty-eight patients did not proceed to surgery, 35 were resected and 27 patients were explored but had unresectable disease. PET was positive for metastatic disease in 39 patients (sensitivity 56%, specificity 94%). Five patients definitively benefitted from PET: in 3 patients PET found disease not seen on CT, and 2 patients with suspicious CT findings had negative PET and successful resections. In a further 12 patients PET confirmed equivocal CT findings. Three patients had additional invasive procedures performed owing to PET avidity in other sites. Utility of PET was higher in patients with suspicious nodal disease on CT [odds ratio (OR) 7.1 versus no nodal disease, P = 0.0004], and in patients without a prior cholecystectomy (OR 3.1 versus post-cholecystectomy, P = 0.04).

conclusionAddition of PET to conventional cross-sectional imaging has a modest impact on management pre-operatively particularly in patients without a prior cholecystectomy and to confirm suspicious nodal disease on CT.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAgedCholecystectomyFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID24894161
PMCPMC4487754
OpenAlexW1983892179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.